New AT&T commercial

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by nateo200, Nov 21, 2009.

  1. nateo200 macrumors 68030

    nateo200

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Location:
    Northern District NY
    #1
    Has anyone seen the new AT&T commercial? It shows AT&T total coverage with some dude throwing postcards all over there coverage map. I'll post a link to a video if I can find it but so far it seams like AT&Ts only retaliation. I think this may be a repost but w/e
     
  2. Zman5225 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    Tacoma WA
    #2
    they have 2 commercial's already to "combat" the Verizon commercials.
     
  3. nburwell macrumors 68040

    nburwell

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Location:
    PHL
    #3
    Yeah, it's Luke Wilson throwing the postcards all over the US map. I love how AT&T feels the need to use celebrities in their commercials.
     
  4. abz786 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Location:
    Alberta, Canada
  5. QCassidy352 macrumors G3

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #5
    Yeah, I think it's not bad but not great. Interesting how hard they've taken verizon's ad campaign (which IMO was only itself decent to begin with).
     
  6. cababah macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, CA
    #6
    he gained at least 15-20lb
     
  7. nateo200 thread starter macrumors 68030

    nateo200

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Location:
    Northern District NY
    #7
    Well it was good AT&T clarified that because all carriers care about these days is bragging about there 3G coverage a term of which most consumers don't truly relise the definition and some just assume it's total coverage.
     
  8. Primejimbo macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Location:
    Around
    #8
    at&t isn't the only who does. Look at T-Mobile a US Cell, and many others.
     
  9. AuroraProject macrumors 65816

    AuroraProject

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    Right there
  10. Resist macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    #10
    AT&T still doesn't get it. It's their 3G coverage that is lacking. They seem to think the Verizon commercials let everyone believe AT&T didn't have cell coverage over the U.S., funny how I understood exactly what Verizon was saying, that AT&T has poor 3G coverage compared to Verizon. It's just fact.

    But I do think Verizon crossed the line when they put the iPhone on misfit island, because now they were also attacking Apple. While AT&T degrades the iPhone, it certainly doesn't mean it is a misfit because it is still a great product without it's cell phone capabilities.
     
  11. nateo200 thread starter macrumors 68030

    nateo200

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2009
    Location:
    Northern District NY
    #11
    Sure you got it but the general population probably doesnt and that commercial clarified misconceptions I'm sure exsisited.
     
  12. deimos256 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    #12
    Verizon may be technically considered "3g" but their evdo is slower than AT&Ts hspa or whatever its called. I lived in the NY/NJ area which is really Verizons bread n butter, their corporate headquarters is in Basking Ridge New Jersey, and while my coverage was excellent i was never impressed with their data speeds like I am on AT&T, granted AT&Ts coverage is kind of a joke but Verizon is also only telling you what they want you to hear, they are spinning things just as bad, there is no big bad bully and no victim in this "battle"
     
  13. AHDuke99 macrumors 68020

    AHDuke99

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    #13
    I think we can all agree that AT&T's 3G coverage is not as widely available as Verizon, but much of that can be blamed on the standard. I believe all Verizon needed to do was a software upgrade, while AT&T had to upgrade every tower to be able to take advantage of the high speed data. In all honesty, AT&T has invested a lot in their network recently, and I now have 3G in all of my places of living, including my island house. If you live in a rural environment, I guess it is still a problem, and perhaps Verizon is better in that regard, but if you live in an urban area with a good number of people, chances are you will be covered.
     
  14. MrCheeto macrumors 68030

    MrCheeto

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    #14
    Yeah I've seen a few, my favorite is "you can still surf the web and talk at the same time on Verizon's network, you just need 2 phones"

    Apple's iPhone retorts are spaztacularly immature. "Can YOUR phone do that on YOUR network? NO! I didn't think so you gimpy lil wa***r!"

    Reminds me of kids picking on eachother in the park.
     
  15. deimos256 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    #15
    i def dont surf the web while talking on the phone but i have sent a few emails while on the phone, i can see that as a plus for biz customers. If they could just eliminate the dropped calls, I honestly feel like im on the playskool network sometimes when someone is trying to talk to me and i get call failled for 10 minutes and poor quality, makes me wonder where my 100 a month is going.
     
  16. kdarling macrumors demi-god

    kdarling

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Cabin by a lake
    #16
    In theory. Practically speaking, it's often faster and more reliable overall, mostly because Verizon built their network for CDMA from the start. (It is critical for 3G on either Verizon or ATT to have cells laid out and configured for CDMA.)

    In places where ATT has reconfigured or added cells, implemented HSPA and added more backhaul, they should be faster. However, since voice and data is shared over their 3G, reliability still suffers.

    Wired 15,000 person survey =Verizon faster than ATT

    PC World test = Verizon fastest and most reliable

    Boy Genius small Survey = ATT faster down, Verizon faster up
     

Share This Page