Base model iMac is pretty good value imo. 16GB ram and the 8 core M4 has the same number of performance cores as the 10 core model, so no reason to pay more going up to the next tier.
Yup. External hard drives are the way to go. I understand how some people might want a large internal drive in a laptop, but not a desktop.256 is also plenty, if like me, you have your files on a server in an office. I don’t need 6 iMacs each with SSD sitting almost empty.
The other nice thing with this lineup is that the base 8 core M4 is 4p4e so it has the same number of p-cores as the 10 core model.
Given Logic doesn’t use e-cores for processing that’s great news!
Edit- my Mac mini has 110 GB used with over 50% free. So 256GB is plenty in my use case.
It really depends on if you keep your photo library and other large files like videos on it or not. My work Mac only has about 100GB used. there just are not that many large local files. Not everyone needs to store large amounts of data.A powerful computer, with an outstanding display, intended to be the hub of your digital world, appropriate for editing your photos, creating your digital video content, and the centerpiece of your computing experience across all your devices.
In what world is 256gb of storage appropriate for that? 512? Do I really have to pay double the cost of the base machine in order to simply have 2tb of storage?
Both my intel based 2019 16” MBP and 2020 iMac have 64GB. Thinking of upgrading the iMac with more.I’m not going to check, but I’m assuming you are also bitching on Intel forums about Intel chipsets with Mac 32 GB ram.
Nice strawman, you can sit down now.What about you let Apple decide what they want to charge “pros” for their products?
It's crazy to see how much faster the base M4 (2024) is compared to the M1 Pro (2021).
View attachment 2443283
But kind of the point is that all of the people who got duped into buying 8GB Pro laptops are still stuck with it. But this move makes clear Apple has known for a long time that 8GB was insufficient for any type of lifespan on the systems.Apple promised a week of updates. It’s only Monday. Don’t drop down to their level.
But kind of the point is that all of the people who got duped into buying 8GB Pro laptops are still stuck with it. But this move makes clear Apple has known for a long time that 8GB was insufficient for any type of lifespan on the systems.
Heads up for users of Adobe apps - fairly easy to get to yellow memory pressure even with 32GB memory:
View attachment 2450249
It looks like it, doesn’t it? But actually doing some fairly simple edits on a 180 mp photo (on an M4 iMac), which is larger than most photos but isn’t exactly extreme. The same editing on my Intel iMac uses about half the amount of memory. Both machines have 32GB ram.Honestly, that looks more like either a memory leak, or rather high-end use.
It looks like it, doesn’t it? But actually doing some fairly simple edits on a 180 mp photo (on an M4 iMac), which is larger than most photos but isn’t exactly extreme.
The same editing on my Intel iMac uses about half the amount of memory. Both machines have 32GB ram.
This is consistent with my previous observations that Adobe apps tend to be memory hogs on Apple Silicon,
and appears to be because they consume a large amount of the unified memory for their graphical acceleration function.