A all-devourer macrumors newbie Feb 3, 2005 14 0 Feb 7, 2005 #26 Platform said: OK But then DDR is doubble data rate , so then it is at least faster Click to expand... G4 chips are not capable of utilizing the "doubling" feature in DDR. To a G4, it might as well be PC133. Or maybe PC166.
Platform said: OK But then DDR is doubble data rate , so then it is at least faster Click to expand... G4 chips are not capable of utilizing the "doubling" feature in DDR. To a G4, it might as well be PC133. Or maybe PC166.
Platform macrumors 68030 Dec 30, 2004 2,880 0 Feb 7, 2005 #27 all-devourer said: G4 chips are not capable of utilizing the "doubling" feature in DDR. To a G4, it might as well be PC133. Or maybe PC166. Click to expand... Yes that is what I'am saying the G5 can utilize a lot faster and more RAM then the G4's
all-devourer said: G4 chips are not capable of utilizing the "doubling" feature in DDR. To a G4, it might as well be PC133. Or maybe PC166. Click to expand... Yes that is what I'am saying the G5 can utilize a lot faster and more RAM then the G4's
B Bear macrumors G3 Jul 23, 2002 8,088 5 Sol III - Terra Feb 7, 2005 #28 Platform said: Yes that is what I'am saying the G5 can utilize a lot faster and more RAM then the G4's Click to expand... Maybe you should have said it clearly then? And if it wasn't clear, a G4 (depending on Mac model) can use up to 2 gigs of RAM.
Platform said: Yes that is what I'am saying the G5 can utilize a lot faster and more RAM then the G4's Click to expand... Maybe you should have said it clearly then? And if it wasn't clear, a G4 (depending on Mac model) can use up to 2 gigs of RAM.
B Bear macrumors G3 Jul 23, 2002 8,088 5 Sol III - Terra Feb 7, 2005 #29 cyanide said: *shakes his head in disbelief* something about this thread made me nauseous, i think it had to do with certain individuals making wild claims without any reasonable ground at all. its late, and im tired. Click to expand... I agree fully.
cyanide said: *shakes his head in disbelief* something about this thread made me nauseous, i think it had to do with certain individuals making wild claims without any reasonable ground at all. its late, and im tired. Click to expand... I agree fully.
Platform macrumors 68030 Dec 30, 2004 2,880 0 Feb 7, 2005 #30 Bear said: Maybe you should have said it clearly then? And if it wasn't clear, a G4 (depending on Mac model) can use up to 2 gigs of RAM. Click to expand... OK sorry about that then
Bear said: Maybe you should have said it clearly then? And if it wasn't clear, a G4 (depending on Mac model) can use up to 2 gigs of RAM. Click to expand... OK sorry about that then