Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And that's fine to have that view. Audiophiles have always been able to buy gold-plated braided shielded speaker cables, for example, at sometimes hundreds of dollars each. The fact that they perform just as well as coathangers is irrelevant to them. Likewise with physical speaker design. In the vast majority of cases the difference between "the best" and "good" is negligible and certainly, the average person could not tell.

The apple homepod and homepod mini should give you options for audio quality in the same way the iPhone and iPhone pro have different imaging sensors. A homepod pro, for example, at the £299 price point with a regular homepod at £199. A homepod mini pro at £89 and a regular mini for £59.
Audiophile speaker wires can cost multiple times the cost of a HomePod, so we aren't talking about the same market.

I disagee with your point about physical speaker design. The speakers (assuming the amp can drive them) make the biggest impact on the sound when the source doesn't change.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nrose101
To be fair to Apple the bill of materials for the Homepod is significantly higher than that of Google Home and the larger Echos. Apple is definitely pitching for the high end... but if you want marketshare you've got to lower the barrier of entry. Siri as a software service isn't as good as Alexa and I'm not sure just having higher quality speakers than competitors is enough by itself to appeal to mass market.

Old image but still relevant:
sq-apple-homepod-cost.jpg
 
To be fair to Apple the bill of materials for the Homepod is significantly higher than that of Google Home and the larger Echos. Apple is definitely pitching for the high end... but if you want marketshare you've got to lower the barrier of entry. Siri as a software service isn't as good as Alexa and I'm not sure just having higher quality speakers than competitors is enough by itself to appeal to mass market.

Old image but still relevant:
sq-apple-homepod-cost.jpg
Amazon and Google have different goals when compared to Apple. They are more worried about gathering data than making a profit, though, I am not sure that is working out with Amazon since they just laid off thousands of people from their Alexa division.

The last I heard, the Mini was selling well, though that may be old news by now.
 
You're right in that Amazon and Google are able to subsidise the ticket price of their hardware through the sale of data whereas Apple does not. It's unfortunate that Apple has quietly increased the cost of the Mini within the last couple of weeks as it was a fairly attractive price. I appreciate inflation can be blamed for this but equally the components surely have a lower manufacturing cost now that it's an older-generation device.

The HomePod Mini is still attractive, but its £99 price point puts it way over the cost of the Nest Mini (£25-40) and Echo Dot (£30-40) especially when you start putting them all around the house as opposed to just having a single device. If you wanted smart speakers in four rooms you're looking at a total cost of almost £400 against just £120 for Echo dots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrose101
For a sound focussed review, WhatHiFi (not listed in the article) is good. https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/apple-homepod-2. They are impressed: "sounds even better. Tighter, more solid, and better organised both spatially and rhythmically, it’s altogether more engaging, exciting and enjoyable to listen to"
How dare you post a link to a good, balanced review from a well respected hifi organisation :D

(Seriously, thank you. That's a decent review)

People in here only want to slate it because it's got fewer tweeters and microphones or complain about the price, without even experiencing the product first hand. The negativity towards Apple in this forum astounds me sometimes.
 
Consider all these reviewers paid actors.

You can't trust them. The new HomePod has less tweeters, slower processor, less mics, slower wifi.

And they want to convince us it sounds better. Yeah, right.
My car has a smaller engine with fewer cylinders than the car I had a few years ago, yet it has a higher top speed, it accelerates faster, it uses less fuel and it's more comfortable.

Technology advances. Duh.
 
After the initial hype it will flop just like the other one
I feel like you're right about that. It's still waaay too expensive,too. It's one thing to be frustrated as heck with Siri for $99, but to experience that same frustration for $299? Yeah, no.
 
One of the few things she has going for her is that she is pleasing on the eyes
Lol yup. But the sad thing is that Apple's marketing products shots all look so fake and rendered now that I go to her channel just to see what stuff actually looks like. All those marketing images are "uncanny."
 
How dare you post a link to a good, balanced review from a well respected hifi organisation :D

(Seriously, thank you. That's a decent review)

People in here only want to slate it because it's got fewer tweeters and microphones or complain about the price, without even experiencing the product first hand. The negativity towards Apple in this forum astounds me sometimes.
I would like to know how they compared them. In the test that had opposite results, one person was blindfolded and they switched the speakers back and forth to get their results. Many audio magazines will simply write that the new one is better. It is why I prefer Stereophile reviews where they at least have charts and graphs next to the article about how someone actually hears it. As I mentioned before, Stereophile can't really measure these speakers, so it just comes down to one person's (though Brian Tong and his fiancé got the same results) opinion.

I would love to see more blind auditions comparing the two... though, I guess it won't matter much since this is the one Apple sells.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Again you are assuming and questioning people’s character even though you have no clue what they sound like. Chances are the sound will be the same. I certainly don’t expect it to be worse. You wouldn’t release a product and have it sounding worse just to make it cheaper by $50
And yet, that’s what they did. Listening to them one after another it’s unmistakably worse.
 
The first HomePod was a flop because it was overpriced for the market it’s aimed at and this new version is only £50 cheaper with all the same hardware and software issues.
i’ve seen this type of sentiment everywhere and I just don’t think it’s true.
The original HomePod didn’t just flop because it was overpriced.
It flopped because throughout the majority of its life, it was the only option from Apple.
It was $350 or nothing, no SE, no previous generation, no nothing.
From February 2018 until November 2020, that was it.
And when they came out with the Mini, it quickly became the best overall selling smart speaker.
This is not new to Apple, the best selling iPod was always the Mini/Nano, the best selling iPad has been the cheapest.
Not Introducing the HomePod as a product lineup was over all what I think doomed that original model.
They should’ve introduced a small $99 HomePod and a big $300 HomePod at the same time back when they first announced it in 2017.
When both Amazon and Google had products at every price point, it made Apple’s single massively expensive option look ridiculous in comparison.
And there were other ridiculous options, the Google Home Max was $400 an equally ridiculous as the HomePod. But it was balanced out because they also had like a $50 dot speaker.
Now that I think that the two products, mini and standard, are presented with basically the same specifications, you’ll see both become a lot more successful.
I also wouldn’t be surprised to see them expand the lineup with a HomePod Pro that’s got a screen or a HomePod Air that doesn’t have to plug into the wall or, my personal dream product, a HomePod Max that turns the thing into an entire home theater set up for the Apple TV, although I think that would be a very niche product, so I doubt they would do something like that.
 
Well I sold off my first generation because of random clicking. Never while playing music. Was odd. MR member bought it and never complained so maybe they fixed it.

Living on one floor of house so one is enough for now.
Once you have a stereo pair, you realize it's clear (to me at least) that a stereo pair is the only way to go with a HomePod setup.
 
First of all. House is too small. One floor of house. Second audio lag still exists and that would drive me mad.

Your house is not too small. Heck, two HomePods on a desk is a transformative experience. Secondly, there's no audio lag, unless I'm misunderstanding what you're saying...
 
How dare you post a link to a good, balanced review from a well respected hifi organisation :D

(Seriously, thank you. That's a decent review)

People in here only want to slate it because it's got fewer tweeters and microphones or complain about the price, without even experiencing the product first hand. The negativity towards Apple in this forum astounds me sometimes.
This is the only review I’ve seen that extensively compares their sound signatures using high quality mics. The OGs sound significantly better.
 
i’ve seen this type of sentiment everywhere and I just don’t think it’s true.
The original HomePod didn’t just flop because it was overpriced.
It flopped because throughout the majority of its life, it was the only option from Apple.
It was $350 or nothing, no SE, no previous generation, no nothing.
From February 2018 until November 2020, that was it.
And when they came out with the Mini, it quickly became the best overall selling smart speaker.
This is not new to Apple, the best selling iPod was always the Mini/Nano, the best selling iPad has been the cheapest.
Not Introducing the HomePod as a product lineup was over all what I think doomed that original model.
They should’ve introduced a small $99 HomePod and a big $300 HomePod at the same time back when they first announced it in 2017.
When both Amazon and Google had products at every price point, it made Apple’s single massively expensive option look ridiculous in comparison.
And there were other ridiculous options, the Google Home Max was $400 an equally ridiculous as the HomePod. But it was balanced out because they also had like a $50 dot speaker.
Now that I think that the two products, mini and standard, are presented with basically the same specifications, you’ll see both become a lot more successful.
I also wouldn’t be surprised to see them expand the lineup with a HomePod Pro that’s got a screen or a HomePod Air that doesn’t have to plug into the wall or, my personal dream product, a HomePod Max that turns the thing into an entire home theater set up for the Apple TV, although I think that would be a very niche product, so I doubt they would do something like that.

A huge reason for its flop was also Apple’s arrogance over third party streaming apps and only allowing Apple Music. They narrowed their market even further. Effectively you needed to want to pay £349 and only use Apple Music which was very shortsighted and something I believe they lifted after a couple of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesHolden
This is the only review I’ve seen that extensively compares their sound signatures using high quality mics. The OGs sound significantly better.
Yep. Which isn't surprising, and I still can't fathom why Apple re-released these HomePods. There's something magical about the OGs in a stereo pair, it has to be reiterated. They fill the space remarkably. It will not surprise me when Apple eventually discontinues the 2nd gen. It doesn't ask any questions the first didn't already answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: unobtainium
Yep. Which isn't surprising, and I still can't fathom why Apple re-released these HomePods. There's something magical about the OGs in a stereo pair, it has to be reiterated. They fill the space remarkably. It will not surprise me when Apple eventually discontinues the 2nd gen. It doesn't ask any questions the first didn't already answer.
Yeah. One of the weirdest Apple product launches (or relaunches) I can remember. “Remember that product that flopped on the market? Here it is for the same price, with worse performance! Please buy it this time.”
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: nrose101
Yeah. One of the weirdest Apple product launches (or relaunches) I can remember. “Remember that product that flopped on the market? Here it is for the same price, with worse performance! Please buy it this time.”
It's a different environment now that they have a bunch of minis in peoples homes. Also, the cost cutting measures of getting rid of some tweeters and mics gives them more wiggle room on price and probably a larger margin.

It still won't be a big seller, but it gives the HomePod category some variety and may keep some people in the ecosystem rather than moving them to Echos.

Personally, I am glad they have something that sounds better than the mini available now. I really don't care how many they sell. It just gives me somewhere to go if my HomePod OG breaks down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrose101
For a sound focussed review, WhatHiFi (not listed in the article) is good. https://www.whathifi.com/reviews/apple-homepod-2. They are impressed: "sounds even better. Tighter, more solid, and better organised both spatially and rhythmically, it’s altogether more engaging, exciting and enjoyable to listen to"

Nice seeing a review from a group with experience evaluating audio. I had a feeling the sound would be better than the original HomePod. I think I'll pick up two more.

As an aside...Sadly, this will no doubt cause many here to be upset.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Nice seeing a review from a group with experience evaluating audio. I had a feeling the sound would be better than the original HomePod. I think I'll pick up two more.

As an aside...Sadly, this will no doubt cause many here to be upset.
This is the same group that claimed CDs sound better when played from the beginning…. 😂. Once again, unless they did some kind of blind test, their results are faulty at best. Would be nice if they said how they compared them....similar to how they didn't discuss their testing process when it came to their conclusion that CDs sound better when played from stop vs pause... need more info.
 
I just came back from skiing in Austria. We were skiing at a relive high altitude (close to 8000 ft) and temperatures were around -10 deg to -15 deg C. My iPhone 13 Pro Max worked flawlessly while I as taking pics and shooting videos. At the end of the day I was always around 30 - 40 % battery capacy. Good enough for me and most likely the average consumer, I suppose.

I had to revert to the iphone as the GoPro I brought along was useless (cold temperatures took a toll on the batteries).
My experience, having owned multiple iPhones since the original and taken them all on backpacking and backcountry ski trips, is that they have become more reliable but the age of the device (really the age of its battery) matters a lot. 8000 feet is also not that high. I haven't had any issues at that altitude (I live at close to 7000 feet), but once you get over 10,000, reliability drops. Over 12,000 and it drops significantly.

The combination of high altitude AND cold really impacts reliability. I live in the Sierra Nevada mountains and frequently hike and ski peaks over 12,000 feet. I've had my iPhone fail on me many many times. I'll warm it up for a few minutes against my body inside my ski jacket, pull it out, and hope it works for a minute or two before it dies again.

To be clear, this isn't a problem unique to the iPhone either. As you noted, your GoPro crapped out on you and I've had other battery powered devices crap out on me too. That's why I would never recommend an iPhone as one's primary emergency beacon. Most consumer electronics are not designed to withstand extreme cold and high altitudes. If you think you need an emergency beacon for whatever you're doing, you need a real one.
 
Last edited:
Sonos makes horrible horrible speakers though…
Lol. Sure, that's why they're so popular, because they are horrible. I've owned Sonos products for over a decade and not a single one has failed. The system works flawlessly. I've compared the Five and OG HomePod side by side and the Five sounds much better. Sonos gets very high marks across the board from reviewers and customers alike. Maybe you should get your hearing checked.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.