There seems to be some really interesting surface detail on the opposite side where we only have a low res image. We may never see up close images of that side in our lifetime. What a fascinating little world.
Yeah, but not as cold as Canada.Who knew Pluto was Canada?
Yep. All because it doesn't clear the area around it in the Kuiper belt of debris. If I recall correctly, Pluto meets all standards for planet status except this, relatively, new definition standard.
I wonder, if the IAU would have reclassified it had it not been in the Kuiper belt. On the other hand, if it weren't, it would be expected that it did clear its orbit of debris with its gravity. An interesting pandora to contemplate..
Another issue is the fact that Charon does not orbit Pluto. The barycenter of the Pluto/Charon system is well over seven times the diameter of Pluto above the surface of Pluto itself, and the two are tidally locked to each other. No body of planet class is tidally locked to any of its moons. The highest ratio of moon-to-planet mass is that of this here rock to its own moon, which is around 1.2%, but the barycenter of this system is still over a thousand miles below the surface of the Earth. Not a whole lot, but enough.
Granted, the barycenter of Jupiter's orbit lies above the surface of the Sun, by a little less than a third of Jupiter's diameter, so maybe we ought to have a different term for whatever that monstrosity is.
Scientists reported Wednesday they finally have "good evidence" for Planet X, a true ninth planet on the fringes of our solar system.
What happened to the old designation Planet X? Most of the recent press is using this Planet Nine instead.You guys hear about Planet 9?
What happened to the old designation Planet X? Most of the recent press is using this Planet Nine instead.
Is the 'X' too confusable with ten in roman numerals, thereby opening up old wounds about the demotion of Pluto, the former ninth planet?
The Director of Planetary Science at NASA refers to it as Planet X.What happened to the old designation Planet X? Most of the recent press is using this Planet Nine instead.
Is the 'X' too confusable with ten in roman numerals, thereby opening up old wounds about the demotion of Pluto, the former ninth planet?
You're right:Per the article, they don't want it to have the connotation of Aliens and End of World-ish type of names.
The Caltech researchers prefer calling it Planet 9, versus the historical term Planet X. The latter smacks of "aliens and the imminent destruction of the Earth," according to Brown.
Added Brown: "We have felt a great disturbance in the force."
"This is the most detailed view of Pluto’s terrain you’ll see for a very long time. This mosaic strip – extending across the hemisphere that faced the New Horizons spacecraft as it flew past Pluto on July 14, 2015 – now includes all of the highest-resolution images taken by the NASA probe. With a resolution of about 260 feet (80 meters) per pixel, the mosaic affords New Horizons scientists and the public the best opportunity to examine the fine details of the various types of terrain on Pluto, and determine the processes that formed and shaped them.
The width of the strip ranges from more than 55 miles (90 kilometers) at its northern end to about 45 miles (75 kilometers) at its southern point. The pictures in the mosaic were obtained by New Horizons’ Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) approximately 9,850 miles (15,850 kilometers) from Pluto, shortly before New Horizons’ closest approach."
Ran across this stunning photo on Twitter just now.
View attachment 667422