After a LOT of looking around at 24" & 30" ACD's NEC PA241 & PA271, Dell U2711, Eizo's & LaCie I made the move. I got tired of waiting on Apple.Anyone tried this new monitor out yet? You have to go to the Small Business Section of the HP site to view its specs.
Just ordered mine too. How lucky you are to be close to see one first hand. I also got from Kanex a 6' Mini DisplayPort to DisplayPort cable for $15.00 plus shipping that I will use on my Mac Mini.After a LOT of looking around at 24" & 30" ACD's NEC PA241 & PA271, Dell U2711, Eizo's & LaCie I made the move. I got tired of waiting on Apple.
I went down to the MacMall in Santa Monica and sat in front of a HP 3065 which is the predecessor to the new ZR30. The screen was BEAUTIFUL...!!! There also was a 27" and a 24" screen sitting on either side of the ZR30w. I tried each of them just to see the size difference. I was sold.
Read the AnandTech Review I think you will be impressed with this monitor. I just bought a new 17" MBP i7. I will hook up a mini display port to display port cable from MonoPrice, order my wireless keyboard and magic mouse and I'm set.
MacMall has them on a HP Promo sale for $1,249.99. They are flying off the shelves. When the Promos are gone it will revert to the regular price of $1,539.99 MacMall also has a free shipping option
Mine is ordered and I can't wait until it arrives.![]()
The ZR30w is wide gamut. It will be great for Photoshop, but horrible for everything else. It's a shame no one, except for Apple, currently makes a 30" sRGB display.
The ZR30w is wide gamut. It will be great for Photoshop, but horrible for everything else.
OK, one more related question.
I understand these are 10 bit panels. Will the GT 330M in the MBP drive this panel to full color depth? I've been through the NVidia site and done some other searching and can't nail this down. I'm guessing the answer is yes.
The NVidia GT 330M will drive the display at native resolution and the miniDisplay port can handle that. It is just a question of color bit depth.
This is my first foray into using a color accurate monitor.
JPEGs from the camera will only be 8 bit, but most of us use RAW which will be 12 to 14 bit depending on the camera.
This is a load of horse hockey.
OS X is color managed, as is Photoshop, as is Safari, and wide gamut never gave me a problem even once. It might have been an issue for Windows XP users and the IE 6 crowd, but people running OS X and modern web browsers have nothing to be concerned with.
In your calibrated screen, OS X will just map everything within the sRGB boundaries. It might not be good for gaming - I really haven't tested that enough to know if there's a discernable difference - but Colorsync baked right into the OS makes everything play nice with colors.
Read up or try it.
Do you think that went to all the trouble of implementing Colorsync for no reason? Or that NEC made wide gamut panels a large percentage of the market couldn't use? In the markets NEC targets, Macs are a way higher percentage than the general computer market. And NEC makes quite a few wide gamut monitors.
Now, there are a few issues - some recent versions of Final Cut, for example, had assumed display gamma of 1.8 even after Snow Leopard switched to 2.2 standard or even if you had configured to 2.2 before then, and I know very little about how well Color works...but this really wasn't hard to implement and I haven't heard about people complaining that their color is oversaturated in Safari with their wide gamut monitors. Or that complaint from OS X users in general.
That said, still has no support for 10-bit color, which is long overdue, in my opinion. 120 Hz would be nice at some point as well, but since that hasn't really been implemented for much other than 3D on Windows, not nearly as important as the 10 bit color supported by Display Port, high end monitors, and all video cards within the last 5 years at least.
Your post is extremely mistaken. OS X's color management doesn't work for wide gamut displays. Read the following thread for more info: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1779590?threadID=1779590
I have just hooked up via DVI to my Macbook Air and can see the image, but it is huge (unlike the Mac display i have at home). I went thru the System Preferences and have both set at 1280 x800. however it is still VERY big and i cannot even open up two Word docs side by side. Any ideas?!
In order to use a high resolution display, you need a display port to dual-link dvi cable if I am not mistaken. A standard DVI won't put out the resolution needed to drive this display at it's native resolution.
I have just hooked up via DVI to my Macbook Air and can see the image, but it is huge (unlike the Mac display i have at home). I went thru the System Preferences and have both set at 1280 x800. however it is still VERY big and i cannot even open up two Word docs side by side. Any ideas?!
In order to use a high resolution display, you need a display port to dual-link dvi cable if I am not mistaken. A standard DVI won't put out the resolution needed to drive this display at it's native resolution.
2) A Display Port to Mini Display Port cable. Cheap and no adapters.