people not on mac forums probably dont even know there is a chin
This is perhaps one of the most legit statements here!people not on mac forums probably dont even know there is a chin
Oh don't forget the wood grain simulated vinyl looking finish like a cheap car interior !Seriously, I think a nice chocolate brown back, with a tan/beige front could be a really attractive option, too. Toss in a deep black back with grey front as another nice possibility.
The box itself is stunning...it screams Apple!It’s interesting the Verge review notes there seems to be quite a lot of enthusiasm for the new colourful iMacs. Normal people (not the specialist mr crowd) seem to like the design.
I also saw an interesting video segment about the design language of the chin. It seems to have been around for such a long time in one form or another that it is considered ‘iconic’ and a visual identifier that the device is not just a tv display panel or monitor but a computer. Maybe Apple did something smart by keeping it, and personally I don’t mind it.
The thing that I liked most about the whole package after watching some of the unboxing and early reviews is the attention to detail… the colour matched handle on the box, matching cables, matching accessories and even highlight colour in the OS. It really just made me say, “ooh shiny, i want one”.
yep saw them in store - awesome looking machine and wouldnt hesitate to buy one if in the market [awatiting the more pro versions]I ordered it and was then worried based on all of the subjective reviews of how "horrible" the white (light gray) bezel was, and the chin, and the "pastel" colors, but I have to say in real life it is truly amazing, the size is perfect (not too big, not too small); the colors aren't actually as bright in person. I have it in Blue and it is light a cool-blueish silver in some light and a cool gray in other light, and that "white" bezel fades away when you're actually using it; in fact, I think a black bezel would make the screen appear smaller. Not to mention its performance, it is fast AF. I'm so glad I upgraded.
The blue looks elegantI ordered it and was then worried based on all of the subjective reviews of how "horrible" the white (light gray) bezel was, and the chin, and the "pastel" colors, but I have to say in real life it is truly amazing, the size is perfect (not too big, not too small); the colors aren't actually as bright in person. I have it in Blue and it is light a cool-blueish silver in some light and a cool gray in other light, and that "white" bezel fades away when you're actually using it; in fact, I think a black bezel would make the screen appear smaller. Not to mention its performance, it is fast AF. I'm so glad I upgraded.
Yes, the blue is perfect - sort of matches my blue iPhone 12 Pro...The blue looks elegant
I guess I wait for that future iMac Pro to be released in space grey, and if I can justify the price for my design needs, then I’ll get it. Otherwise I’ll settle for the silver iMac.
I prefer it with no logo. A $10,000 refrigerator has no logos on the front, but Samsungs and Maytags do. Nearly every product at Design Within Reach has no logos. None of my furniture has logos, I don’t know why I need my computer to. The logos are to benefit the companies, not me. I’m not looking to broadcast a company’s logo or stare at one all day. My favorite sneakers (Common Projects) don’t have a logo. Just about every Yeezy sneaker hides the logo where it’s hard to see, and the designs are iconic without relying on logos. Compared to a Nike where they slap a giant logo on the side, which looks way more pedestrian. A surface can just be blank imo. I really don’t know how a logo benefits me. Imagine putting logos on dishes, pots, and vases because the blank surface feels too plain. People who design products for the home usually know to put logos on the bottom and let the object just exist. When designers add logos, it’s to invade the users’ space with their business goals.
If you look at any image from Dwell or Architectural Digest, you’ll see no logos. These new iMacs fit in better with elegant home designs than the previous ones.
I'm pretty sure that member meant they didn't want their attention to be detracted from the screen which is why Apple did not include the logo, which was explained in the keynote. Nothing wrong with the logo being on the back but when you're working the screen should be the only thing focused on. That's why I'm perfectly fine with the white bezel and the muted colorway on the front chin. I didn't get it at first but in the end Apple knows what they are doing and tends to make sense to most.Fair enough... but there's a big freaking Apple logo right in the middle of the back of the iMac - even the new 24" colored M1 iMac... so which is it? Logo good or logo cheap? Can't be both.
The design — inside, outside — beautiful. Perfectly positioned in the Mac lineup.
I get it all — the M1, the colors, the white bezel, the logo-less chin, the power brick. Brilliant.
What exactly do some not get about this remarkable machine?
Which just goes to show don’t take much notice of other peoples preferences and hang-ups .wait to make your own mind up.I ordered it and was then worried based on all of the subjective reviews of how "horrible" the white (light gray) bezel was, and the chin, and the "pastel" colors, but I have to say in real life it is truly amazing, the size is perfect (not too big, not too small); the colors aren't actually as bright in person. I have it in Blue and it is light a cool-blueish silver in some light and a cool gray in other light, and that "white" bezel fades away when you're actually using it; in fact, I think a black bezel would make the screen appear smaller. Not to mention its performance, it is fast AF. I'm so glad I upgraded.
Fair enough... but there's a big freaking Apple logo right in the middle of the back of the iMac - even the new 24" colored M1 iMac... so which is it? Logo good or logo cheap? Can't be both.
Those who like the redesign are mostly silent or subdued in their appreciation. Those who don’t like the redesign seem compelled to come into every thread and reassert their endless cries of the new iMac being ugly, toy like and only for the little people who don’t do ”serious” work. The detractors are dedicated to proclaim they aren’t taken in by Apple’s efforts. I don’t understand the complusion to constantly decry what others like actually looks like crap and is totally unremarkable. It’s not a display of superiority, but of insecurity. And it certainly isn’t changing anyone’s mind about getting one.
Fact is the new iMacs will perform very well for easily 90-95 percent of users in the market. Very very few users will actually need something more powerful than this, and for them a bigger machine is coming by the end of the year.