Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
why people waiting for the new iPhone should be distracted by iMacs and viceversa ?

If Apple were just targeting the readers of MacRumors, and others with a big wad of cash in a jar with an Apple logo on their mantlepiece then that might not be a problem.

If Apple actually want to continue to expand their market, however, they need to reach a wider audience. One thing they've got good at in the last 10 years is turning their announcements into international news stories, and in that case launching too much in one go will dilute the coverage.

If Apple launch a phonebook full of products then MacRumors will happily cover the lot, but non-Apple-centric publications will have a limit on how many "column-inches" (or the electronic equivalent) they'll want to devote to Apple in one go. If Apple were to launch iPhone 5, iPad Mini, new iPod range, new iMac then a lot of non-Apple sites will just pick one to headline and discuss in detail and mention the others in passing. Give it a few weeks between each launch and Apple can score a headline for each one. Also, if there are any 'controversies' (e.g. "New iPhone drops telephone function - 'nobody uses iPhones to make calls any more, and the carriers are a bag of hurt' says posthumous Jobs memo") then although there ain't no such thing as bad publicity, the iMac isn't going to get much coverage.

Then there's who to invite to the launches (which will always be over-subscribed): you don't want to bore the Music press and Youth magazines with new iMacs before/after you show then new iPods and music services, the 'mainstream' press will be more interested in the iPhone/iPads. Having separate events lets Apple target them.

Finally, there is the logistics: generally, when Apple launch things they like to say 'available now' or at least 'available in 2 week's time'. C.f. other companies who risk the Osbourne Effect by having a new product announced when the last product has barely made it into the shops (*cough* ASUS *cough*). That takes a lot of logistics and even a big company like Apple can only do so much in one go.

That's not to say Apple won't launch multiple products - they do seem to have got themselves into a bit of a hole whereby everything other than the MacBooks are overdue for an update. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to see minimally changed iMacs with Ivy Bridge and USB3 quietly snuck out in a press release.
 
If Apple were just targeting the readers of MacRumors, and others with a big wad of cash in a jar with an Apple logo on their mantlepiece then that might not be a problem.

If Apple actually want to continue to expand their market, however, they need to reach a wider audience. One thing they've got good at in the last 10 years is turning their announcements into international news stories, and in that case launching too much in one go will dilute the coverage.

If Apple launch a phonebook full of products then MacRumors will happily cover the lot, but non-Apple-centric publications will have a limit on how many "column-inches" (or the electronic equivalent) they'll want to devote to Apple in one go. If Apple were to launch iPhone 5, iPad Mini, new iPod range, new iMac then a lot of non-Apple sites will just pick one to headline and discuss in detail and mention the others in passing. Give it a few weeks between each launch and Apple can score a headline for each one. Also, if there are any 'controversies' (e.g. "New iPhone drops telephone function - 'nobody uses iPhones to make calls any more, and the carriers are a bag of hurt' says posthumous Jobs memo") then although there ain't no such thing as bad publicity, the iMac isn't going to get much coverage.

Then there's who to invite to the launches (which will always be over-subscribed): you don't want to bore the Music press and Youth magazines with new iMacs before/after you show then new iPods and music services, the 'mainstream' press will be more interested in the iPhone/iPads. Having separate events lets Apple target them.

Finally, there is the logistics: generally, when Apple launch things they like to say 'available now' or at least 'available in 2 week's time'. C.f. other companies who risk the Osbourne Effect by having a new product announced when the last product has barely made it into the shops (*cough* ASUS *cough*). That takes a lot of logistics and even a big company like Apple can only do so much in one go.

That's not to say Apple won't launch multiple products - they do seem to have got themselves into a bit of a hole whereby everything other than the MacBooks are overdue for an update. Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to see minimally changed iMacs with Ivy Bridge and USB3 quietly snuck out in a press release.

But then again Apple managed to launch new MacBook Pros and the iPhone 3GS back at WWDC 2009. Plus they introduced the 13" MBP.

What you said is right and seems logical, but Apple is not known for its logical release schedules ;)
 
But then again Apple managed to launch new MacBook Pros and the iPhone 3GS back at WWDC 2009. Plus they introduced the 13" MBP.

What you said is right and seems logical, but Apple is not known for its logical release schedules ;)

This!! Anything could happen at the event despite what products are being announced or not. I really don't think apple cares too much this point about press, apple is so big now that they could do almost just by word of mouth I remember when the first iPad came out, I was in the cafe of my school and I could just hear everyone talking about it, it was insane. At this point apple can release anything anytime and people would buy it no matter what's being launch together or how many press it gets. But that' just my opinion.
 
But then again Apple managed to launch new MacBook Pros and the iPhone 3GS back at WWDC 2009. Plus they introduced the 13" MBP.

True - I never said this was some inviolable law of nature, just an argument as to why it might be best not to release too much in one go.

Also, WWDC is a slightly different kettle of fish: its Apple's one remaining "fixed feast", not tied to any particular product line, and Apple are kinda obliged to offer something new for both iOS and Mac. Plus, it's still actually a developers conference, and Apple's chance to clue developers in about what new technologies they need to support. (That might have influenced the announcement of the rMBP this year: they needed developers to start supporting retina mode).

These "media events" however are usually targeted at a particular product. This time around, the poster has already made it clear that they will be launching something with a "5" in it. I'm guessing that it isn't to announce the availability of the Jackson 5's back-catalogue on iTunes or Babylon 5 on Apple TV. The iPod launches are usually similarly flagged.
 
Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to see minimally changed iMacs with Ivy Bridge and USB3 quietly snuck out in a press release.

Everything you wrote make sense but! Last sentence is most important for us:

99% users from MacRumors forum are just waiting for new IB and USB3.0. That's all we want.
 
Everything you wrote make sense but! Last sentence is most important for us:

99% users from MacRumors forum are just waiting for new IB and USB3.0. That's all we want.

Personally, I agree with the above... but my biggest "want" is improved SSD options. The current $/GB of SSDs has improved significantly over the past year, so I expect that the SSD options will be much better than the 2011 iMac. I would be delighted with 500GB - 1TB SSD options in the '12 iMac. That would work well in conjunction with my Pegasus 8TB R4.

/Jim
 
I believe it.

5 = five years anniversary of iPhone. 5 shiny new things :D

I am pretty sure it is 6 years. I could be mistaken.maybe its just six versions ? Who knows . I dislike their naming conventions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPhone
iPhone:
4 and 8 GB:June 29, 2007, 16 GB: February 5, 2008
iPhone 3G:
July 11, 2008
iPhone 3GS:
16 and 32 GB: June 19, 2009
Black 8 GB: June 24, 2010
iPhone 4:
GSM (Black): June 24, 2010
CDMA (Black): February 10, 2011
White: April 28, 2011
8 GB: October 4, 2011 (Available from Oct 14, 2011)
iPhone 4GS:
October 14, 2011
iPhone 5?
 
Personally, I agree with the above... but my biggest "want" is improved SSD options. The current $/GB of SSDs has improved significantly over the past year, so I expect that the SSD options will be much better than the 2011 iMac. I would be delighted with 500GB - 1TB SSD options in the '12 iMac. That would work well in conjunction with my Pegasus 8TB R4.

/Jim

True! What is more, easy acces to HDD can be game changer for lot of users, but personally I don't think that apple will do that...sadly
 
True! What is more, easy acces to HDD can be game changer for lot of users, but personally I don't think that apple will do that...sadly

With TB... upgrading the internal HDD is less important than in the past. A TB RAID HDD array is quite fast. Depending upon the options offered in the '12 iMac... I might go full SSD (or dual SSD) and move large media to the Pegasus R4.

/Jim
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.