Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think what you are looking for is the Hush Nag Blocker app.
Hush is great but occasionally breaks websites that won't show content until you have clicked through the cookie banner. So just be aware occasionally you have to disable it to get through, but can re-enable once the cookie prefs are set.
 
F66FA89F-B528-41BF-9C93-62E280FDA1E2.jpeg

Uh yea….dunno about that. I’m going get this refunded
 
What's everyone's go-to Content Blocker these days? I'm still using the Legacy version of 1Blocker.
 
My experience is that the websites are usually better maintained and more feature rich than the apps. As an example, the only thing on the bank’s app that is not available on the web is the ability to deposit checks. There are a great many other features on the web not available on the app. Many apps also only work well on phones and are not optimized for ipad.
 
What's everyone's go-to Content Blocker these days? I'm still using the Legacy version of 1Blocker.
Firefox Focus works great for me and it's free. You can use the extension to block ads ect. in Safari.
 
View attachment 2039347
Uh yea….dunno about that. I’m going get this refunded
Just fyi, this is the exact same warning text that is displayed for each and every extension that alters websites you visit in some way. It seems to currently be an all or nothing affair, a bit more granularity in iOS in this matter would be helpful.
Also, it seems to be possible to activate Banish under ‘content blockers’ (which do not have this kind of access) without activating the actual extension, although I haven’t tried yet if this has any effect on functionality…
 
View attachment 2039347
Uh yea….dunno about that. I’m going get this refunded
Hi, can you tell us if you can grant permission per website instead of granting it for all websites? I wouldn’t care if it had access to twitter or Reddit webpages. But obviously, allowing access to all websites without granular selection make it much more instructive, and a potential security risk.

For instance, on my ad blocker, I have only enabled the extra features for your tube, as I don’t mind the dev having access to YouTube.com while I browse. For all the other websites I rely on Apple’s content blocker API, which doesn’t allow the dev to have access to the websites I visit.
 
Hmm all ad blockers have this description. No way they can do their job otherwise. Look at uBlock Origin's description on desktop (non Apple) browsers, it's exactly the same. And if you can't trust them, you can't trust anyone.
Wipr does not unless you enable the optional Extra which targets YouTube ads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max2 and Populus
Just fyi, this is the exact same warning text that is displayed for each and every extension that alters websites you visit in some way. It seems to currently be an all or nothing affair, a bit more granularity in iOS in this matter would be helpful.
Also, it seems to be possible to activate Banish under ‘content blockers’ (which do not have this kind of access) without activating the actual extension, although I haven’t tried yet if this has any effect on functionality…
Any ideas on how to a/b test the extension vs content blocker? I suppose we could ask the dev! Might drop him a message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max2
Hmm all ad blockers have this description. No way they can do their job otherwise. Look at uBlock Origin's description on desktop (non Apple) browsers, it's exactly the same. And if you can't trust them, you can't trust anyone.
There are content blockers that rely on Apple’s content blocker API, that way, the dev doesn’t have access to the data of your navigation and cannot gather or modify directly the contents of your navigation.

And if you want a more aggressive approach (for YouTube for instance) many adblock devs such as Giorgio Calderolla (Wipr) allow you to select on which websites you want to grant full access to the extension. In my case, only on YouTube.com
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: max2
The one I really want to see is a Safari extension to keep App Store webpage links from opening in the App Store app. Yes, occasionally that’s helpful - other times it’s really annoying. Like when I just want to grab the URL to put in a document, or when I want to see the page to see the price of the app (say, I want to tell a friend how much this neat app costs, but Safari “helpfully” redirects me into the App Store app, which no longer tells me the price but instead gives me a button to open the app - I JUST WANT TO SEE THE DAMN WEB PAGE, TYVM!

Especially galling when when you want to see the web page on a Mac and it redirects into the Mac’s App Store app, which proceeds to tell me the app is only available on iOS (yes, gee, I knew that already, thanks).

There used to be an extension for this, but Apple changed the way that extensions work 3 or 4 times, and the author gave up on updating the app.
 
Uh yea….dunno about that. I’m going get this refunded
This is how all extensions work; the only way they can make any changes to the sites you visit is to read what's on them and apply alterations to them. It's their literal purpose. Apple's wording here is very severe, but they're just describing how all such extensions function.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.