New iPad Pro faster than MBP's?

Discussion in 'iPad' started by MBX, Jun 5, 2017.

  1. MBX macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    #1
    It sounds like these new iPad Pro's are beasts in terms of performance, CPU, etc. Is it faster than a MBP, let's say a 13'' 2016 base model?

    And if yes why doesn't Apple start putting their own CPU's in laptops too if they're more efficient and faster?
     
  2. gobikerider macrumors 68000

    gobikerider

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Location:
    United States
    #2
    Nope not possible CPU performance it may almost be there but it's not quite and gpu is stuck on crap 12 core power vr architecture I did the math and the iris pro in MacBook Pro atleast 60x as fast/more powerful than the iPads graphics. If your curious were I'm getting these numbers go to geekbench browser website look up compute scores for iPad Pro (A9X) and then MacBook Pro 13inch (i5 6630u) that might be wrong, its the i5 with iris graohics tho. So in conclusion CPU speed closing in quick, but gpu has honestly hit a wall. Hopefully it'll catch up when Apple implements its own custom architecture of it. Also keep in mind being iPad and iOS it's entirely different need wise vs MacBook Pro tradition x64 operating system so really the MacBook Pro having a 60x times quicker gpu isn't a big deal, go look up the vids the iPad Pro can render 4K video at lightning speeds well lets just say it's not slow. I can't wait to see how the new iPads improve upon the already solid performance of the A9X but keep in mind the A11X is going to be the HUGE jump everyone is hoping for, since that will be the 7nm or 10nm processor.
     
  3. thunng8 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    #3
    What the heck are you on? Had a quick look at Geekbench compute

    a9x: 17417
    https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/compute/582247
    13" 2016 macbook pro:28091
    https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/compute/800590

    If you look at pure graphics performance - you can look up gfxbench where the a9X is faster than iris graphics in the macbook pro 13" 2016:
    a9x:
    https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?ben...e=Apple A9X GPU&did=27138730&D=Apple iPad Pro

    13" 2016 macbook pro:
    https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?ben...pple MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Late 2016)
     
  4. DaniJoy macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Location:
    California
    #4
  5. garyleecn macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    #5
    I remember reading somewhere that geek bench is optimized for A-series CPUs, the real world performance is much different
    --- Post Merged, Jun 5, 2017 ---
    Because such thing as iMac pro exists. A-series CPU and GPU can never compare with those, and it's way to expensive, difficult and buggy to maintain an OS in two different architectures.
     
  6. thunng8 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    #6
    Geekbench is supposed to be optimised for all the platform it supports. There was some controversy with Geekbench 3 where too much emphasis was on encryption (Apple Ax chip are very fast at encryption) - but that has largely been solved with Geekbench 4 where encryption only play a small part in the overall results.

    you do realise that in the benchmark that article is mostly relying on - the developers of the benchmark have been accused of cheating and colluding with intel?

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/3023...ntel-of-cheating-with-sysmark-benchmarks.html

    There is a reason why no site ever mentions tabletMark when doing benchmarks - too unreliable. In fact, that article is just about the only time I've ever seen tabletmark mentioned in a benchmark comparison.
     
  7. jmeas macrumors regular

    jmeas

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2015
    Location:
    San Jose
    #7
    There are articles on this forum (from around the time the iPad Pro 12.9 was released) regarding comparing the speed of an iPad to a Macbook. I remember the discussions comparing the IPP vs the 12" Macbook, and I also remember folks saying that it's hard to compare given that the architectures of the CPUs are different.

    Either way, iOS is pretty limiting, so I don't think making iPads faster is going to be as useful as either:

    1. apps that can take advantage of the power
    2. changes to the app store to encourage developers to make apps that can take advantage of the power
     
  8. DaniJoy macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Location:
    California
    #8
    Dude I have iPad pro's. They are great for low power or very specifically optimized workflows. But They are not as fast as any high end laptop. The point was take any benchmark with a grain of salt. They all manipulate or make mistakes.
     
  9. masotime macrumors 68000

    masotime

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    #9
    This. Essentially:
    1. iOS needs to evolve a sufficiently advanced SDK that allows for apps to have features on par with desktop equivalents.
    2. The App Store needs to evolve to a point where software houses can earn comparable revenue / profit from app sales of fully featured pro apps.
    Fortunately, Apple is beginning to recognize this - the many many changes in iOS 11 are a very good step in this direction.
     
  10. DaniJoy macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Location:
    California
    #10
    Yup. In a couple generations or less Apple tablets will have enough power to be very productive. Bring on the Pro apps please. Glad to see Apple is moving in a direction towards content creation. Drag and drop is very innovative, I remember when I first saw it in windows 3.1... magic!
     

Share This Page