Liquidmetal is radio frequency transparent. Lends credence to NFC rumours?
is it radio transparent? Got the source as I can't find it, please?
Liquidmetal is radio frequency transparent. Lends credence to NFC rumours?
Yes, but the screen size difference is a little more significant. If you were Apple, what would you do to convince people to pay an additional $100 for the 5.5" iPhone. If the larger body can accommodate improved specs, why not use that to entice potential customers. Most people buying the 4.7" iPhone won't care that for $100 more you can get marginally improved specs on a larger iPhone. For them, size will matter much more than that.
If the general consensus on MacRumors is any indication, I don't think the iPhone Pro 5.5" is going to do very well.
For the 5.5" to sell well, it MUST have greater specs than the 4.7" iPhone in practically every way (INCLUDING the resolution of the screen). Up until now, all the leaks have pointed towards a 4.7" and a 5.5" with the exact same resolution. Lame. Who wants a bigger screen without more pixels? Anybody? ... *crickets*... That's what I thought.
These might be the craziest iPhone rumors so far...
If Apple is hell bent on having an iPhone that is $100 more expensive then fine. Just don't force people to have to make a compromise on screen size to get it. I would pay more for an iPhone with the best camera (OIS), more memory, sapphire screen, water resistant, etc. But I don't want a phablet. Right now Apple is selling more iPhones than ever. And those are 4" devices. No way do I believe the majority of these people want a 5.5" device. I think it would be a serious mistake for Apple to make its (likely) most popular iPhone model inferior spec/material wise.
----------
Doesn't the iPad mini have more pixels than the iPad Air? Why does the 5.5" device have to have better specs to sell well? The iPad Air and mini have nearly the same specs and Apple doesn't seem to have any problems selling the Air (I'll bet it outsells the mini).
So you think the 0.8" screen size increase justifies the extra $100 people will be paying? I don't.
The plastic bands are ridiculously hideous. I can't imagine the designers at Apple looked at that and thought it was OK.
It's like Pontiac Aztec ugly. Convertible Murano ugly.
I'm hoping that they will paint and color them to match the case.
is it radio transparent? Got the source as I can't find it, please?
plastic bands get filled with liquid metal????![]()
There's evidence to support that it absolutely is "going to happen."
So you don't use a case? I know plenty of people don't, just asking.and extremely ugly. What is going on here?! First those atrocious lines and now a raised lens to get caught on my jean pockets. Better be worth it.
What I meant was the mini has greater ppi than the Air. Does that make the larger screen Air an inferior device?
plastic bands get filled with liquid metal????![]()
What I meant was the mini has greater ppi than the Air. Does that make the larger screen Air an inferior device?
Just like they did with the iPad Air and iPad Mini with retina display.........oh wait they didn't.
Wait... The... Lens pops out of the rear shell.... WHAT!?
Talk about sacrificing practicality over a sleek design.. Laying this on every surface will be a pain.
Bring back blurry cam!
Of course the camera won't protrude.
I hope the unfinished shell means the camera part is actually recessed as it has always been and that this is just pre fit.
I would prefer a thicker shell if the camera needs the extra depth, seems stupid to ruin such lines with a camera part, the phone needs to agree with my OCD before any thinness specs which for the most part become pointless once adding an big old thick case that adds 1-3mm of girth!
Ah, I understand your point now.
No, the Air is not an inferior device because it doesn't have more pixels. You're right in that regard.
My point is just that even the 4.7" screen won't be 1080p (according to rumors). If that 5.5" comes out with less than a 1080p resolution, the display itself going to look sub-par in comparison with all the "other" 5.5" devices on the market now in terms of resolution (ie., clarity).
----------
This. Would. Be. Awesome.![]()
Ah, I understand your point now.
No, the Air is not an inferior device because it doesn't have more pixels. You're right in that regard.
My point is just that even the 4.7" screen won't be 1080p (according to rumors). If that 5.5" comes out with less than a 1080p resolution, the display itself going to look sub-par in comparison with all the "other" 5.5" devices on the market now in terms of resolution (ie., clarity).
or the way they did it with a 13" and 15" MBP
So you don't use a case? I know plenty of people don't, just asking.
Oh man, you're telling me! It's going to be SOOOoooo hard placing it on its back on a surface with half of it sitting a fraction of a millimeter higher than the previous. This is the WORST THING EVER. STEVE JOBS NEVER WOULD HAVE STOOD FOR THIS!!!
It has higher PPI but also worse color I believe. There were a few trade offs between the display, most importantly of which was screen size, but those were the only differences between the iPad Air and iPad mini with retina. The same will be true about the iPhone 6 4.7" and 5.5"