Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The iPhone mini was a commercial failure by every metric. Yes, it had its small fanbase of support, but so did AirPort and Newton and Pippin. It's not coming back because the market has spoken and decided that small phones should be priced cheaply, not at a premium, even with the Apple logo on the back.

Most people who wanted a small phone simply wanted a cheap phone that’s good enough.
 
Also in retrospect, the iPhone 5c is looked back on as an overhyped over priced disaster that was very poor value compared to the 5S, especially when it comes to software support.
The idea of Apple making a plastic iPhone today is laughable.
Absolutely, that was the biggest miss in the history of the iPhone. While it was a fun and colorful phone, the cases were truly ridiculous (grated cheese holes that obscure the Apple logo feels like a Design 101 mistake) and the price of $99 to $199 cheapened the iPhone and made it seem like a flimsy, lightweight piece of plastic — that's in direct opposition to the sturdy, heavy, powerful feel of the iPhone Pro, which I greatly prefer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMax
I definitely hear you on that, but the iPhone is easily the most valuable tech product in the world. Discounting it in any way threatens the whole house of cards for limited upside. Apple is fiercely defensive of its profit margins and they would rather bow out of a product segment than sell cheap stuff.

Unfortunately, we aren't in iPod times anymore and Apple is no longer desperate to get new people to buy Macs. 87% of US teenagers (yes, you read that right) have an iPhone. Adding a new mini would bump that up by maybe 1 to 2% but would also make the iPhone so mass-market that it no longer has appeal.
The iPod use to be Apple's most valuable price point. Even when they had high capacity storage iPods selling for 499, they had cheaper models like the shuffle. Didn't affect their margins negatively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMax and klasma
The iPhone mini was a commercial failure by every metric. Yes, it had its small fanbase of support, but so did AirPort and Newton and Pippin. It's not coming back because the market has spoken and decided that small phones should be priced cheaply, not at a premium, even with the Apple logo on the back.
Newton and Pippin, what memories of the past are you bringing back @Ion-X. I used to have a Newton back in the day and it must lie somewhere in the attic.
 
This would make sense as in 2025 the iPhone 14 will be the 3rd tier device and will be replaced by a 4th gen SE with an new chip (A17?) and modem, and maybe switching it to a single lens camera system. Would fit with the development of the 1st and 2nd gen SE, with the outlier being the 3rd gen SE, which should've been an XR/11 with an A15.
 
The iPhone mini was a commercial failure by every metric. Yes, it had its small fanbase of support, but so did AirPort and Newton and Pippin. It's not coming back because the market has spoken and decided that small phones should be priced cheaply, not at a premium, even with the Apple logo on the back.
This is a good point, but Apple likes to gimp their SE lineup somehow so that people spend more to get a better phone. Why not "gimp" the phone by making it a smaller phone for that fanbase?
 
That's what Androids are for. iPhone competes in the high-end phone market. OPPO and Huawei compete in the low-end market.
🤣 Pricing an iPhone at $429 (iPhone SE) is not targeting the high-end market. And when you can get that iPhone model and others for free many service providers, that undermines your thesis that the iPhone competes (only) in the high-end market.

What high-end car dealer gives cars away for free?


14.png


Also, Oppo and Huawei compete in all segments, from low-end to high-end, as they have handsets that are priced between $200 and $1,000 and more (Oppo Find X5 Pro and Huawei P60 Pro are priced near $1,000; Huawei Mate X3 is priced close to $2,000)
 
Last edited:
This is a good point, but Apple likes to gimp their SE lineup somehow so that people spend more to get a better phone. Why not "gimp" the phone by making it a smaller phone for that fanbase?

Apple doesn't want to gimp the phone to the point where it's only attractive to a couple million people globally. It's same reason why Apple didn't use iPhone 5C as the basis for the first SE. Apple still wants revenue and profit for SE, just with lower expectations.

The iPhone mini is a failure from a sales and adoption standpoint. Why would Apple knowingly revive a failed product? In addition, the mini doesn't offer economies of scale because the mini never sold well in the first place.
 
Ugh.

I'm glad this year is upgrade year for me as I'll have a nice reliable Qualcomm cellular chipset instead of whatever first generation buggy crap Apple throws together for their first cellular chipset.

The chips that Apple has transitioned to their own design have been very solid so far. They seem to have better quality control than the software devision.
 
Not going to lie the Original iPhone SE (1st Generation) was a pure act of masterpiece. 🏆

View attachment 2187916
A great thing about the first generation iPhone SE is that it used both the latest camera and the latest CPU (A9) that was on the then current latest flagship (iPhone 6S).

The second and third generation iPhone SE both used an old camera that was on the iPhone 8. That’s because Tim Cook is a greedy cheapskate who cuts corners to maximize profits.

But at least the second and third generation iPhone SE used the latest CPU (A13 and A15) they were on the then current latest flagship (iPhone 11 and iPhone 13). That might not happen with the next iPhone SE because Tim Crook now doesn’t even give the latest CPU (the A16) to the latest non-Pro iPhone models and instead gives them the previous generation iPhone’s CPU.
 
A great thing about the first generation iPhone SE is that it used both the latest camera and the latest CPU (A9) that was on the then current latest flagship (iPhone 6S).

The second and third generation iPhone SE both used an old camera that was on the iPhone 8. That’s because Tim Cook is a greedy cheapskate who cuts corners to maximize profits.

But at least the second and third generation iPhone SE used the latest CPU (A13 and A15) they were on the then current latest flagship (iPhone 11 and iPhone 13). That might not happen with the next iPhone SE because Tim Crook now doesn’t even give the latest CPU (the A16) to the latest non-Pro iPhone models and instead gives them the previous generation iPhone’s CPU.
the A15 is still a grate chip set for the ones that don't want to spend 1,000 plus on a new iPhone the iPhone SE 3 is a grate pick even no the A15 may be last year chip set its still a grate chip set to used in 2023 and going foreword I have a A15 iPhone SE and A15 apple TV no need to spend $1,000 for the newest stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMax
When Apple starts selling iPhones for $299 they become a generic manufacturer that's not considered prestigious or premium by consumers. Yes, it's ironic and counterintuitive, but humans are trained by millions of years of evolution to prize rare goods like spices and gold because they are rare and expensive.
But iPhones aren’t rare or precious. They’re about as common as muck. They just got away with huge price hikes because of the perennial underdog attitude.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.