I'm running an '08 2.8x8 and just watched a 720P trailer of '9' and it barely tugged the CPU to 5%. H.264 is no strain on a MP.
I have 1080p trailers on 2.8x8 and they put up to 70% cpu load.
So it is a strain on the MP. Ofc you can watch it without any issues, but hardware acceleration is always welcome.
How does the new 8-core 2,26 Ghz Mac Pro perform when it comes to H.264 full HD video editing (in Final Cut Pro)?
How does the new 8-core 2,26 Ghz Mac Pro perform when it comes to H.264 full HD video editing (in Final Cut Pro)?
Full HD requires a high memory bandwidth which the new MacPro can provide.
>>> Canon 5D MKII
Can you guys run a 1080p quicktime trailer and look at CPU usage? I'm wondering if that was only a treat for MacBooks or every new Apple product will have it.
Yes but not on OS X.Note: the 2008 Mac Pros already support hardware accelerated
decoding under Windows with the 8800GT (I don't know about
the other cards):
Yes but not on OS X.
Currently the only macs known to be supporting hardware acceleration under OS X are Macbooks and Macbook Pro's.
I'm afraid that's what you get on a minority platform: no hardware
decoding, no blu-ray, no Photoshop 64-bit, no Maya 64-bit, etc etc.
But the important thing here is that both the new and old MPs will
support it, if Apple writes the software. It's not about the machines,
per se, but the drivers. I.e., it's not about Mac Pro hardware, as the
subject line indicates. It's about OS X and Apple's willingness to do
the coding.
Why would you be editing in H.264?
AVCHD, which you may or may not have heard of, is H.264. And Panasonic, among others, are working on a new AVC-Intraframe compression method. So expect to see more H.264 being used in video editing. It is, after all, the codec of the future.
The boosts we're seeing are related to SSE 4, aren't they? The instruction set meant to boost video handling in hardware?