Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i know all the prices very well. and i know the prices of high end professional monitors, i use them everyday, from $4k sony to a $34k dolby monitor. and still, the price of this monitor is too high for what it is.

So youre saying it's worse than the $4K Sony you mentioned? What's the specifications comparison between the two? I'm curious.

Supposedly it is higher spec than a $43K Sony.

"
Apple compared it to one of Sony's pro monitors targeted at film studios that its new monitor technically surpasses - Sony's asking price for its monitor? US$43,000, which makes the new Apple monitor a relative bargain for what it offers.
While Sony's reference monitors are capable of producing up to 1,000 nits of brightness, the new Pro XDR display from Apple can produce 1,000 constant nits of brightness up to a peak of 1,600 nits of brightness. This is coupled with a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio, matching a Sony reference monitor. This is actually good enough to take the display beyond a standard HDR rating to an XDR rating (Extreme Dynamic Range). Capping things off, the Pro XDR supports true 10-bit color, good for producing more than a billion colors. Its pixel density is Retina class as well, with 218 ppi versus typical monitors that max out at 150 ppi.
"
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.