Just curious, what are you doing with 60 tabs?I have no idea how you do it. I have 16gb ram and it doesn’t matter what browser I’m on it lags like crazy after 50 or 60 tabs. I can do double that, easy, on my iMac with the same amount of ram.
Just curious, what are you doing with 60 tabs?I have no idea how you do it. I have 16gb ram and it doesn’t matter what browser I’m on it lags like crazy after 50 or 60 tabs. I can do double that, easy, on my iMac with the same amount of ram.
If your 2019 machine can't handle Word, Mail/Outlook and web browsing at the same time without stuttering, then it sounds like something is wrong with your Mac in particular.
Just curious, what are you doing with 60 tabs?
Well that is a memory issue, you probably need more than 32GB RAM for that kind of use. I work in IT and have seen 10 users use over 256GB RAM combined when working with large numbers of tabs like that (on a terminal server). As to why your iMac is better with 16GB, I don't know without looking at the differences between the models and who you work. But from my experience 16GB of RAM is not enough for your kind of usage.Naw, I’ve tried using other MBP and it’s the same issue. 50-60 tabs and it starts dragging. I should be able to do three times that.
[automerge]1584565443[/automerge]
We have a medical record system that is browser based. Every test (bloodwork, radiograph report, vaccine titter, etc) ever run opens in a new tab. So 8-14 patients with even only a few years of data and it adds up quick.
Likely, but I don’t think it’s the whole story. Thing is, I don’t have the issue with my iMac or with my Windows 10 machine both which have 16 GB. I used to be ok with the Surface Pro 4 with 8GB, but then one day it started having issues. That’s when I got the MBP.Well that is a memory issue, you probably need more than 32GB RAM for that kind of use. I work in IT and have seen 10 users use over 256GB RAM combined when working with large numbers of tabs like that (on a terminal server).
No WiFi 6 has to be an error on the webpage, right?
While the base functionally is built into the I/O PCH support chip coupled to the Ice Lake class . A system vendor still has to buy a PHYS solution from Intel to fully implement WiFi 6. If Apple passed up buying Intel's solution (e.g., their custom tweaks to Wifi/Bluetooth connections for automagical "Handoff" ) then they wouldn't necessarily get WiFi 6.
If they bought the complete Intel solution that would be strange. (even several AMD based systems buy Intel's WiFI 6 solution to roll out latest WiFi. Apple seems likely doing something quirky here. )
If history repeats itself, Apple will probably release a new feature and say "Hey, if your Mac has WIFI 6, you can have this feature. Otherwise, go pound."
They did this with continuity / handoff which pissed many of 2011 MBA users. I could totally see them doing this again just so the 2020 MBA buyer will have reason to upgrade to the 2021 or 2022 MBA.
Exactly the MacBook I've been waiting for, at exactly the moment I feel scared to spend the money on it.![]()
For AoE2 why not just use crossover? WINE will handle it just fine, and no need to fully boot into Windows for it. It's not like AoE is massive graphics heavy these days...
If you have large storage needs (#3), that will always be top priority IMO, as it's a fixed "amount" whereas #1/#2 on your list are going to be performance oriented and somewhat subjective "nice to have" boosts, barring large VM stuff where RAM is critical.
Although keep in mind you can always use an external hard drive when necessary. You won't be able to upgrade #1 & 2.
That's a fairly subjective "solution" on storage..
For me, I can't stand the thought of having dongled up storage hanging off my MacBook Air all the time.
Only this user can really know what to do for them I suppose.
Shame they have no SD slot anymore.
That's a great way to add storage to older machines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#HDMI_Alternate_Mode_for_USB_Type-CBecause usb-c -> hdmi adapters uses displaylink drivers (cpu simulate gpu data a send them to this adapter...)
Nice work. I think you’re right.i3: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...1000g4-processor-4m-cache-up-to-3-20-ghz.html
i5: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...1030g7-processor-6m-cache-up-to-3-50-ghz.html
i7: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...1060g7-processor-8m-cache-up-to-3-80-ghz.html
Base frequency and turbo speeds are configurable these days...
Naw, I’ve tried using other MBP and it’s the same issue. 50-60 tabs and it starts dragging. I should be able to do three times that.
[automerge]1584565443[/automerge]
We have a medical record system that is browser based. Every test (bloodwork, radiograph report, vaccine titter, etc) ever run opens in a new tab. So 8-14 patients with even only a few years of data and it adds up quick.
Continuity uses Bluetooth LE and mesh Wi-Fi capabilities. They may have been able to emulate a poorer version on older hardware, but it's not like it was an arbitrary cutoff.
No, because they can’t read it and I don’t have time to pull them up and between patients.Shouldn’t you be closing these tabs in between patients coming in? Data protection or doctor-patient confidentiality?
That’s one way to avoid the issue