Although, saying that, I'm running Word now (updated ofc) and it's running just fine, no more than 5% CPU usage for my whole system, on lots of text and photo heavy docs. Maybe it is an issue with your machine?
I've seen spikes in CPU when using Word 2011 on all 3 Macs I have owned, so I dont' think my machine is faulty - if I close Word, battery estimates are in line with Apple's claims.
How large were your Word documents and were you working in them, or did you just have them open? I'd like to try to see if I can duplicate your usage fairly closely to see if it's a problem with Word or with your MBA.
I was working with 4 docs, averaging about 100 pages each. Grammar and auto spell-check are disabled. I've also removed fonts from the Mac OS Font Book that fail the compatibility test.
I opened a 40 page document, typed in another 3 or 4 pages today and at the end the battery had gone from 100% to 90% in about 45 minutes. Thats about what I would have expected, given it was also connected to WiFi, Bluetooth mouse connected and screen brightness was a little over 50%.
This seems to be pretty much what I saw at first. I thought "OK, I should get 7-8 hours; not stunning, but pretty good". However, the estimated time remaining decreases non-linearly, so that a 10% = 45 mins, became 10% = 30 min, then 10% = 20 min. I didn't run the battery completely flat using Word, which I should try one day.
I did find that once I close Word (battery was at about 70% I think), that I got about another 6 hours out of the machine until it died with moderate web browsing (Chrome), mail (PostBox), Preview docs (may 6 open) and Evernote.
The power estimates are way off. I have safari, unity, monodevelop, word, and outlook open and i get between 10-12 hours of battery life. My estimate says 6.
You may be right. The ultimate test is actually using the machine, but it would be helpful if the estimates were more accurate so one could plan when you need to find a power outlet.
I don't think any word processor is dramatically draining anyone's battery.
But mine does! And this is my point - a word processor *shouldn't* tax a modern computer - it's a glorified text editor FFS. If it's not doing a spell check, running some macros, or something that is obviously "processing", all it should do is occupy memory with very low CPU cycles. I can't understand why I often see my MS Word process at 99% (i.e. one full core of my 2 core machine.)
I will try Libre Office (again), when working on documents that I don't have to regularly share. I can live with doing some reformatting in MS Word once of twice, but if you're working in a team on a shared document, then LibreOffice/OpenOffice is unacceptable - it generally screws up something in the formatting every time it moves between MS Word (Windows) & Libre Office.
This does raise the general question of how good is MBA battery life under various CPU loads. It's all well and good to say "I get <nn> hours running application <xx>", but without knowing what resources application <xx> uses, you don't have an absolute measure.
It would be good to create a graph of CPU usage vs Battery life, e.g. at 50%, 100%, 150%, 200% CPU (assuming 2 cores) - how long will it last? I bet people doing Handbrake encodes don't get a lot of time!