Yup, just tried holding 6 & 4 on my mini during boot-up, it took a little longer to boot the first time (building cache?) and when I checked the system profiler, 64-bit was active!
Yup, just tried holding 6 & 4 on my mini during boot-up, it took a little longer to boot the first time (building cache?) and when I checked the system profiler, 64-bit was active!
As far as I understand, only Xserve computers boot 64bit by default. Most macs in the last 1-2 years are capable but don't boot 64bit automatically.
Why do the latest 320m Mac mini's have the configuration from apple to be purchased in 4gb or 8gb models if the os only boots in 32 bit mode? This seems crazy to me!
On practice, there is no difference between the two modes.
i don't think you really understand what 64-bit kernel boot mode means. it has nothing to do with audio fidelity.Running 64bit for some music applications will sound better this way.
i don't think you really understand what 64-bit kernel boot mode means. it has nothing to do with audio fidelity.
your mileage may vary. I, at least, like to have the option and decide for myself.
.
I can't wait to do some listening and report back. There seems to be some voodoo with anything revolving around audio. Boutique cables and tweaks, it really gets crazy.
Read and you will understand.....
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/783948/
Basically, mac is different than windows. Macs that boot into 32 bit (all other than xserve) still can use all your memory if the app is 64bit. Windows on the other hand is limited to 4GB if running in 32bit. Actually booting into 64 (via holding 6 and 4 keys at startup) may not give much benefit at all except on MacPros with large amounts of ram and in most cases will cause problems unless all your apps, drivers etc are 64bit.
Interesting read, thanks. My experience is with Linux, and getting more than 4gb of ram required a PAE kernel, but still binaries compiled under 64bit won't work on 32bit and vice versa.
Another reason why OS X is superior?
Cheers.
Erm.... even my early 2009 mini was 64bit, so this should be no surprise.
...and what is that response adding to a 10 year old post?There is 32-bit support for Windows machines. There's also a lot more Windows machines contributing than Linux or OSX, as you can see here, hence it gets more attention and keeps a broader support base. With the Pande Group's limited resources and manpower, it may be easier for them to only support one core each for OSX and Linux. I know that Linux SMP folding has required a 64-bit OS for several years, so there's likely a technical reason that 32-bit doesn't work for both Unix-based OSes.