Originally posted by blue&whiteman
I agree with paulwhannel. its not a parctical design at all. apple is obsessed with clean looking practical things and that mockup is neither.
How is this not practical? If apple were to say, sell these 17" monitors at $499, and they were able to cram a G4 in a domed enclosure like that, it would SERIOUSLY sell for $1299 which totals $1800, the same as the current iMac 17".
Then in two years, people could buy a G6 model and keep their 17" monitor. Make it compatible with the towers, make it MATCH the towers, and make stuff like PCI-X, 8gb of ram, etc, available only on the towers, and you have two disntinct, practical product lines.
It would also end ALL of the complaining about "wasting" an LCD when the iMac is obsolete.
Hell, maybe they sell the 17" and the dome in a package for $1599 or some specialized pricing. That would seriously be hot.
I'd be tempted... 1.6 ghz G4 and 1.8.
Fast: 1.6, 512 ram, 60gb $999
Faster: 1.8ghz 512ram 80gb $1199
Fastest: 1.8ghz, 1gb ram, 120gb $1299
Add your choice of monitors:
15" LCD, $299
17" LCD $499 (Widescreen)
20" LCD $999 (Widescreen)
23" LCD $1499 (Widescreen, HD)
I think they'd move a lot more units this way. And it bridges the gap for people that want a "cheap headless box" and the people that like the iMac, it's an extension of the current design, etc etc etc.
I dunno. I wouldn't be surpised it Vitruvius isn't suing apple in a few months. it seems he's onto something, and has a "form follows function" design here....