New purported Blackberry Z10 specs emerge

Discussion in 'Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices' started by AutoUnion39, Dec 27, 2012.

  1. AutoUnion39 macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #1
    http://bgr.com/2012/12/27/blackberry-z10-specs-rumor-270723/

    [​IMG]

    Pretty pathetic specs from a so-called "Android killer." It merely matches the almost 1-yr Galaxy S3 in specs.

    It uses the same Snapdragon S4 processor that the S3 has had. In fact, the MSM8960 chip came out in Q1 2012. There is no reason why it should have last year's processor, when everyone else has moved forward with the Snapdragon S4 Pro (quad-core). It has the same 2gb of ram. And has a smaller battery to boot (1800 mah vs 2100 in the S3). And the display is sub-par at this point.

    Let's not forget both HTC and Samsung will be showing their flagship devices in the next couple weeks at CES. Both will have 1080p displays, quad-core processors, huge batteries.

    RIM is done if they think this is enough to make an impact. RIM has no chance if Samsung comes out with a class-leading Galaxy S4, which is probably what is going to happen.
     
  2. Macman45 macrumors demi-god

    Macman45

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Location:
    Somewhere Back In The Long Ago
    #2
    I think RIM are finished anyway and I doubt that the device will even get to market...They've been teetering on the brink for a long time now.
     
  3. AutoUnion39 thread starter macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #3
    I bet it will come to market, but just fail. They're trying hard, too late. There is no reason why they shouldn't have been trying to keep up with competition all these years.
     
  4. Smithwicks macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    #4
    The ridiculously sized blackberry branding at the bottom of that phone would be a definite dealbreaker for me.
     
  5. 3bs macrumors 603

    3bs

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    #5
    I didn't notice it until you mentioned it but you're right, it is off-putting. At least it's better than Verizon's logo on the Note 2's home button!

    Verizon-arrogantly-stamped-its-logo-on-Galaxy-Note-IIs-home-button-AND-back.jpg
     
  6. ChrisTX macrumors 68030

    ChrisTX

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Location:
    Texas
    #6
    This device will more than likely flop, but that's a different story. But to credit Rim somewhat, the BlackBerry was still selling remarkably well during the first couple of years of iPhone. I think what happened though, is eventually people started to see everything the iPhone was capable of, and the BlackBerry was lacking, and that's when the mass exodus took place. They lacked any sort of vision. They thought that by placing the existing BB software on a touchscreen phone(Storm 1, and 2) that it would keep people from diverting. But anyone that's ever used a storm knows just how badly implemented it was.

    Agreed, they could use the extra space for more screen real estate. Too much bezel on the top, and bottom here.
     
  7. AutoUnion39, Dec 27, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2012

    AutoUnion39 thread starter macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #7
    Ya, that's a good point, you bring up. But that was also at a time when iOS/Android weren't being used by big corporations.

    As iOS and Android matured, IT folks and the public realized that you can have a business phone, but still play Angry Birds on it when you're bored, so the mass exodus to iOS/Android in the biz world started to happened.

    Merely matching one year old Android hardware is a poor choice, when Samsung will waste no time marketing their new Galaxy phone with a 1080p screen. We all know how good Sammy really is with marketing nowadays.
     
  8. ChrisTX macrumors 68030

    ChrisTX

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Location:
    Texas
    #8
    Not only were business folk embracing iOS/Android but they were all finally realizing that it was cheaper to implement the "bring your own device" policy. Unfortunately for Rim, no one was bringing BB devices.
     
  9. siiip5 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    #9
    This phone was built much like the Playbook. Get a somewhat okay product on the market that is a big improvement over what Blackberry owners are used to. This phone is already outdated by Android standards, but leaps and bounds above what BB users have right now.

    RIM is still going under though. Unless Canada bails them out.
     
  10. nfl46, Dec 27, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2012

    nfl46 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #10
    How is it outdated? Hell, even Apple can't keep with Android specs. Apple has proved, it's all about OS optimization. The new Blackberry specs are pretty good for a early 2013 device. I watched some videos of it, and the OS is fluent.

    As someone stated in the comments:

    iPhone 5 1.2Ghz vs BB 1.5Ghz
    iPhone 5 1GB Ram vs BB 2GB Ram
    iPhone 5 8Mp Camera vs BB 8Mp Camera
    iPhone 5 1.2Mp front Cam vs. BB 2Mp front Cam
    iPhone 5 no hdmi vs BB micro hdmi
    iPhone 5 4 inch screen vs BB 4.2 inch screen
    iPhone 5 Battery 1440mAh vs BB 1800mAh

    Pixel density on iPhone5 - 326ppi
    Pixel density on BB - 356ppi

    Needless to say, we aren't getting a new iPhone 5S until Fall 2013.
     
  11. AutoUnion39 thread starter macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #11
    You're forgetting that RIM can't match the brand name/recognition of Apple. A good amount of iOS users are bitter old BB owners. Apple proved that it is all about OS optimization, but they've done it year after year and built a huge base around it. RIM has been ****ing around all these years and making half-assed phones, like the BB Storm to suddenly be taken seriously.

    And if the benchmarks say anything, the iPhone5 already is faster than the S3. If this BB is merely matching the S3, it's still going to lag behind the iPhone5.
     
  12. SomeDudeAsking macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    #12
    Specs don't matter. At least that's I kept hearing when the S3 beat the 4S in specs and benchmarks.Now with the iPhone 5, specs matter again even when the S3 and the Note 2 have higher GeekBench scores?
     
  13. AutoUnion39 thread starter macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #13
    US-spec S3 with the S4 SoC does not have a higher GeekBench score. 1584 vs 1410.

    Note 2 is faster because of its Exynos chipset.
     
  14. siiip5 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    #14
    The 5S is slated for a March release, as is a retina display iPad Mini. But that's not the point.

    I'm not sure why you compared a vaporware BB10 specs to what will be a 6 month old iPhone 5 and not to what we are expected to see from from companies like Samsung with the S4 (also scheduled for a March release). And by the way, we still don't know when the BB10 phones will go on sale. We only know that RIM (is supposed to announce the phone on Jan 30th. But with their track record, you can expect a delay in the announcement, or a delay in the ship date!)

    Back to next years Android phones: 1080p screens (that is over 400ppi on a 5+ inch screen, not a little screen like the iPhone or BB10), quad-core, 3gb of RAM, S5 Snapdragon SoC or equivalent, minimum 32gb of internal storage, with SD Card extension, and of course a larger, removable battery.
    And I wouldn't be surprised if Blackberry is dumb enough to price the BB10 the same price as an iPhone of S4/Note3. So except for a small niche of Blackberry users buying these, we can expect sales to be less than what WP8 phones have seen. There are several points of failure for RIM, but a small app selection will be a huge one. (Hopefully, they allow Android apps to work on it.)

    All that said, I still wanna get my hands on one. I'm pessimistic about RIM's survival, but I wanna try out the phone and maybe buy one for posterity when RIM finally files for bankruptcy and disappears from the mobile market.

    ----------

    Lowest score I get is low 1700's on my S3. Not that it matters. These scores have been and always will be based off b.s. No two phones, even the same make and model, will show the same scores. Unless there is a vast difference in numbers, a user won't tell the difference when using the phone.
     
  15. AutoUnion39 thread starter macrumors 601

    AutoUnion39

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    #15
    Yup, the next round of flagship Android phones are around the corner and if Apple does launch a 5S in the Spring, RIM is toast.

    If RIM is dumb enough to sell these phones for more than $99 on contract, they don't stand a chance. They need to take the underdog approach, but I somehow doubt they will.
     
  16. Diiiiips macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    #16
    willing to bet you any money you like that the 5S will not be out in March or even within 3 months of March!

    The S4 on the other hand, you might get it in April/May if youre lucky.
     
  17. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #17
    I think the phone will get to market, but no one will really care. RIM sat on their laurels for too long and are paying the price.
     
  18. siiip5 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    #18
    Why would I want to bet you? I said it is 'slated' for a March release, but that is based on rumors.
     
  19. thejadedmonkey macrumors 604

    thejadedmonkey

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Pa
    #19
     
  20. 0dev macrumors 68040

    0dev

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    #20
    The problem with RIM is they were very short sighted. They achieved success by offering smartphones with e-mail and good keyboards and thought that was the central pillar of what a smartphone should be. They never developed beyond that basic idea to realise that the real developments would come from further internet functionality, further integration with web services, and most importantly, computing ability.

    Even worse, they literally haven't developed either their hardware or software at all. The basic design of BlackBerries today is the same as it always was, as is the OS. It took them far too long to realise reliance on the good old days wasn't enough to keep the company relevant.

    So now they finally realised this, they took years to actually do something about it, and they've still not brought anything to market. And you know what? It's a real shame. This is a company with a rich history which brought us the first ever (commercially successful) internet enabled smartphones. But they thought their dated approach was enough and laughed when Apple and Google told them otherwise and now they're paying the price for that.

    Sorry RIM :(
     
  21. Melab macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    #21
    The industrial design looks great. Ever since the iPad first came out that is all I've ever cared about.
     
  22. Awakener macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    #22
    Unless I'm missing something that's just on the home screen for the advertisement?


    You may be right, but Apple's image is changing as it grows.
    Hopefully Blackberry OS 10 will take off because it will force Apple to innovate.
     
  23. Diiiiips macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    #23
    Because it's not "slated" for a March release and never has been by any credible website.
     

Share This Page