14", edge to edge, non retina, 16:10 screen please.
Why would you want a non retina screen?
14", edge to edge, non retina, 16:10 screen please.
Common sense.How do you know the new MBA won't have a touch screen?
That is thinking inside of the box. Laptop makers seeing the sales numbers of tablets and having the idea that a laptop with a touchscreen might participate in the growth of touch computing. It does not work that way.Think outside the box my friend. Almost all new Windows laptops have a touch screen now.
Common sense.
Common sense.
That is thinking inside of the box. Laptop makers seeing the sales numbers of tablets and having the idea that a laptop with a touchscreen might participate in the growth of touch computing. It does not work that way.
Both CPUs with x86/64 instruction set and mouse/keyboard control are a given in future MacBooks. But weight, heat, noise and battery life can take a lesson from iPads. A future MacBook Air might even have LTE and GPS.
Would love a completely noiseless notebook without any moving parts...
I'm curious about the lack of fan. Is this the ARM-powered MacBook that has been rumored for a while?
Even a touch keyboard?
Common sense.
That is thinking inside of the box. Laptop makers seeing the sales numbers of tablets and having the idea that a laptop with a touchscreen might participate in the growth of touch computing. It does not work that way.
Both CPUs with x86/64 instruction set and mouse/keyboard control are a given in future MacBooks. But weight, heat, noise and battery life can take a lesson from iPads. A future MacBook Air might even have LTE and GPS.
ps. For those crying over the 17 inch.. Well stop trying to make it happen because it wont happen. Sorry for your lost. Just move on.
Why would you want a non retina screen?
14", edge to edge, non retina, 16:10 screen please.
Yes. 99% of people use them as desktop replacements that happen to be mobile for meetings or to work outdoors if it's a nice day![]()
If you want to use touch as a main input method, you have to adapt every user interface element in the whole OS and all its applications. Traditional computing with a mouse pointer is much too mature and useful as it is now, to simply throw it away. And if you have to redo all UI applications anyway, you could as well build a new touch-based OS. That's what iOS is.Sure, occasionally, they feel like they want to touch something on the screen if it's on a web page with a big font and big buttons. But for daily activity, they don't.
Touch is not just another sensor.It's a natural progression IMO, another sensor.
Yes. 99% of people use them as desktop replacements that happen to be mobile for meetings or to work outdoors if it's a nice day![]()
My 11" MBA is my one and only computer for home use and at my job (electrical engineering).
I love the ultra portability. I just want a retina screen so I can see the same high resolution graphics on the road as I can on an external display.
Drop Retina, go for IGZO, thz
Drop Retina, go for IGZO, thz
I am mourning the loss of devices with capabilities they already produced.
Yeah. I'm right there with you. It really bums me out. I love the company but lately have been feeling more in sync with non apple products.
![]()
This is what Apple has to do:
There has to be more choice so Apple should have the following lines:
11" Non-Retina MacBook Air
12" 16:10 Non-Retina MacBook Air
12" 4:3 Non-Retina MacBook Air (like the popular old Powerbook)
12" 16:10 Non-Retina MacBook Air
12" 16:10 Retina MacBook Air
13" Non-Retina MacBook Air
13" Retina MacBook Air
13" Non-Retina MacBook Pro
13" Retina MacBook Pro
15" Non-Retina MacBook Pro
15" Retina MacBook Pro
17" Non-Retina MacBook Pro
17" Retina MacBook Pro
And what's with these names? So hard to pinpoint which model is which. Apple needs better product names, for instance X109-11-SMBA14 for the Non-Retina MacBook Air and X109-13-RMBP14 for the 13" Retina MacBook Pro. "MacBook Pro" and MacBook Air" are too vague. This would give us choice and make the lines more differentiated and clear.
![]()
If you want to use touch as a main input method, you have to adapt every user interface element in the whole OS and all its applications. Traditional computing with a mouse pointer is much too mature and useful as it is now, to simply throw it away. And if you have to redo all UI applications anyway, you could as well build a new touch-based OS. That's what iOS is.
I dunno-- the differences between the MBA and MBP are fading as the MBP gets smaller and lighter. If they go retina on the MBA, then moving to ARM would be a differentiator. The 13" MBP ensures they won't loose much marketshare if the ARM switch turns out to be a mistake.Really doubtful.
While it gets better performance for its battery life - ARM overall is still way too slow. Plus Intel has been working on improving their efficiency as of late.