Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New Tower 3 ( git client ) only subscription base, alternatives?
- Thread starter al404
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
960design
macrumors 68040
How about just using the command line?
https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-The-Command-Line
Here is a pretty good starter tutorial:
Normally GUI makes everything easier, but I've been through the GUI lane of git and I continually seem to fall back to Terminal, as it is just so much faster / easier in most workflow scenarios.
Besides old school Tower ( have not used it in a couple of years ) I've recently looked at:
https://desktop.github.com/ for teaching new developers, but end up just falling back to Terminal for 'instruction' purposes.
Note: not a teacher, just have a club for software development, been using git since it was called stupid version control.
Last edited:
They're probably not as slick as Tower, but SourceTree and Git Desktop are free, well-made, and cover a large majority of use cases. If those don't work for you, check out the list of GUIs at git-scm.com or as @cjoy mentioned, use the client integrated in your IDE if applicable.
elppa
macrumors 68040
Git Kraken is another alternative for a standalone client.
Git has a quite sub optimal CLI interface with little accommodation made for consistency or usability and the official documentation is quite unwelcoming. I always think is a brilliant piece of satire (so good its barely distinguishable from the real thing). So I can understand why one would look for a GUI.
Git has a quite sub optimal CLI interface with little accommodation made for consistency or usability and the official documentation is quite unwelcoming. I always think is a brilliant piece of satire (so good its barely distinguishable from the real thing). So I can understand why one would look for a GUI.
I have a license for Tower v2 on the Mac and bought Tower v1 for Windows with the hope that their Windows app will mature more and close the gap to their already very nice Mac version.
The new subscription model is bad because it has no fallback if you don't subscribe anymore. With Jetbrains you get perpetual access to a version if you paid for 12 months after that version has been released and with 1Password the vault becomes read-only but you can still export it into CSV and import in some other app. With Tower 3 you just lose your access to the app. 🙁
To add insult to injury I would have to pay extra for their Pro subscription because I run my own GitLab CE instance on a little VPS.
I am also looking for alternatives and the Electron-based alternatives GitKraken and GitHub Deskop just don't cut it. I usually leave my Git GUI open in the background and I can't have it eating away my RAM and battery just because it is made by web technology.
Currently, the interesting alternatives are Fork and SmartGit.
Fork is a little younger and still might miss some features here and there but it is a native app and both Mac and Windows versions are currently heavy in feature development. Just check its changelogs!
SmartGit looks like a powerhouse and although it is a Java app it does feel lighter than the Electron alternatives and it looks more native than them.
Fork seems to be free during its still ongoing beta and I don't know what its business model will look like. SmartGit's price is very enterprisy (=expensive) but it allows both single payment purchases or subscriptions. AND it is free for non-commercial use. 🙂
Personally, I might pick SmartGit. It is already mature on both platforms and after Tower I won't buy a pig in a poke again.
The new subscription model is bad because it has no fallback if you don't subscribe anymore. With Jetbrains you get perpetual access to a version if you paid for 12 months after that version has been released and with 1Password the vault becomes read-only but you can still export it into CSV and import in some other app. With Tower 3 you just lose your access to the app. 🙁
To add insult to injury I would have to pay extra for their Pro subscription because I run my own GitLab CE instance on a little VPS.
I am also looking for alternatives and the Electron-based alternatives GitKraken and GitHub Deskop just don't cut it. I usually leave my Git GUI open in the background and I can't have it eating away my RAM and battery just because it is made by web technology.
Currently, the interesting alternatives are Fork and SmartGit.
Fork is a little younger and still might miss some features here and there but it is a native app and both Mac and Windows versions are currently heavy in feature development. Just check its changelogs!
SmartGit looks like a powerhouse and although it is a Java app it does feel lighter than the Electron alternatives and it looks more native than them.
Fork seems to be free during its still ongoing beta and I don't know what its business model will look like. SmartGit's price is very enterprisy (=expensive) but it allows both single payment purchases or subscriptions. AND it is free for non-commercial use. 🙂
Personally, I might pick SmartGit. It is already mature on both platforms and after Tower I won't buy a pig in a poke again.
960design
macrumors 68040
I guess that with GitHub client you need to publish repository on their server
I mainly use git on my local machine, to track changes on my projects
Analog Kid
macrumors G3
Found this in the "similar threads" section provided by MR:
https://gitfinder.com
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...nt-for-macos-with-finder-integration.2042171/
Anyone given it a look yet?
https://gitfinder.com
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...nt-for-macos-with-finder-integration.2042171/
Anyone given it a look yet?
Yeah, I did the same. $70 a year? This subscription mentality needs to end. You aren't owed revenue simply for existing...