Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
  • Like
Reactions: DPUser
Up until the Ventura, the newest macOS was made available for Mac models being up to 7 years old on average. Has been that way for a while. Now with Ventura Apple got more aggressive with the compatibility cuts, and we are now down to only 5 years:

macOS 13 Ventura (2022) →→→→→→→ Eldest supported models 4-5 years old (2017-2018)*
macOS 12 Monterrey (2021) →→→→→ Eldest supported models 6-7 years old (2014-2015)*
macOS 11 Big Sur (2020) →→→→→→→ Eldest supported models 5-7 years old (2013-2015)**
macOS 10.15 Catalina (2019) →→→ Eldest supported models 7 years old : (2012)
macOS 10.14 Mojave (2018) →→→→→ Eldest supported models 6 years old : (2012)*
macOS 10.13 High Sierra (2017)→ Eldest supported models 7-8 years old (2009-2010)
macOS 10.12 Sierra (2016) →→→→→ Eldest supported models 8-9 years old (2009-2010)
OS X 10.11 El Capitan (2015) →→ Eldest supported models 8-10 years old (2007-2009)
OS X 10.10 Yosemite (2014) →→→→ Eldest supported models 7-9 years old (2007-2009)
OS X 10.9 Mavericks (2013) →→→→ Eldest supported models 6-8 years old (2007-2009)
OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion (2012)→ Eldest supported models 5-7 years old (2007-2009)
OS X 10.7 Lion (2011) →→→→→→→→→ Eldest supported models 6-7 years old (2006-2007)
OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard (2009) → Eldest supported models 3 years old : (2006)

*Excluding the Mac Pro. MacOS 13 supports 2019 (3 years!), Mac OS 12 supports 2013 (8 years!), and MacOS 10.14 supported 2010 (8 years!).
** Big Sur was weird for iMac support. Lowest and highest 2014s were supported, but for mid-tier models a 2015+ was needed.


Security updates usually are maintained for 1-2 OS versions back.
But in total you only get at most 5 + 2 years now.
Include that into your purchase decisions.
I don't understand this table - why is there a date range for each OS? Eldest (should be oldest) supported models for El Capitan, for example, isn't 8-10 years (2007-2009), it's 10 years (2007). That is, by definition, the oldest supported model.
 
Did the 21.5" Intel iMac ever get a T2?

I was going to guess that next year's release would drop all Intel Macs without a T2, but that may be a bit too much... that being said, I agree, macOS 15 isn't going to be pretty for Intel. Maybe a few remaining 2020 T2-equipped models survive for that year, maybe they don't...
Only the 27” 2020 model iMac had a T2.
 
I'd be extremely disappointed if Apple stop to support my 2020 iMac before 2025 at a point I think I'd return to Microsoft. Its a little Ironic that Apple is probably the company who support their mobile devices the longest, but its a little questionnable for their computers. My 2009 PC still have Windows 10 updates 13 years later.
Yes, but the road, or at least the officially supported road, for every pre-2018 Windows PC ends in 2025 with the restrictive hardware requirements for Windows 11.

This is what happens when OS upgrades are free - if Microsoft still charged the usual pricing for OS upgrades, I'm sure they would rather sell you a retail upgrade for three times the revenue that they get from selling HP/Dell/Lenovo an OEM licence.

(The thing to note about Microsoft, too, is that until Windows 11, they were still operating under the backlash to Vista. Vista was the last time hardware requirements were substantially increased and the reaction was so bad that they basically never increased hardware requirements since. A mid-high-end system that could run 64-bit Vista well in 2007, and yes there were such things, will run 10 just fine until 2025. And, assuming 8 was skipped, it hasn't contributed a penny of revenue to Microsoft since buying a Windows 7 upgrade in 2009.)
 
I don't understand this table - why is there a date range for each OS? Eldest (should be oldest) supported models for El Capitan, for example, isn't 8-10 years (2007-2009), it's 10 years (2007). That is, by definition, the oldest supported model.
Different years for different product lines.
For example, El Capitan:
2007 is the oldest supported iMac and MacBook Pro model.
2008 is the oldest supported Macbook and Mac Pro model.
2009 is the oldest supported Mac Mini model.

Eldest was the adjectives originally used by the OP.
 
Different years for different product lines.
For example, El Capitan:
2007 is the oldest supported iMac and MacBook Pro model.
2008 is the oldest supported Macbook and Mac Pro model.
2009 is the oldest supported Mac Mini model.

Eldest was the adjectives originally used by the OP.
Aha, got it, thanks!
 
Aha, got it, thanks!
I’d be perfectly happy on 14 as long as they kept posting security updates. There’s not much more I need the OS to do than it does right now. It would be nice if they just kept posting security patches for intel based systems until they end their lifecycle. Also, now it just pushes the damn choice - do I bite the bullet and build a Linux server instead of my Mac Mini. It’s still an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifti
I wish no more Intel Mac support just because I hate the Intel era.

It was important to move from PPC to Intel because Motorola-IBM were not delivering.

But a Mac isn’t a real Mac if it has PC hardware inside it.

Now we have real Macs again. It’s even more Mac than the Motorola era because now it is pure Apple Mac.
This is not a purity test. Having an Intel processor does not make a Mac “dirty” or a not a true Mac. Lots of people have still have useful Macs with Intel processors and will keep them for a while.
 
This is not a purity test. Having an Intel processor does not make a Mac “dirty” or a not a true Mac. Lots of people have still have useful Macs with Intel processors and will keep them for a while.
It makes me laugh when I read posts saying they literally want Apple to stop supporting Intel ASAP and the importance to go forwards. Computers aren't phones and only the nerds/fanboys/big tech enthusiasts upgrade every 2-3 years. Normal people keeps their computers for 6-8 years minimum and not getting updates after 3-5 years is just unacceptable.

And don't forget people who bought they macs on 2017-19 didn't had any idea M1 Macs would come except they read tech news (personally I didn't know about M1 until 2020) and people who bought the iMac 2020 have the same right to get macOS support as everyone else who bough a M1 Macs. They paid a good amount of money for it and it was the only big iMac available until they completely cut this category so its even more obvious they have to support these machines at least 3-4 more years.
 
This is not a purity test. Having an Intel processor does not make a Mac “dirty” or a not a true Mac. Lots of people have still have useful Macs with Intel processors and will keep them for a while.

It’s not about pUriTY tEsT, so those three members who gave ‘angry face’ reactions need to kinda look at themselves and control their feelings.

The concept of Macintosh is that it is an end to end customized and optimised system that shouldn’t have to rely on 3rd party components.

When there was reliance on IBM/Motorola the vision failed when G5 failed to deliver. Then again it failed when Nvidia and ATI graphics chips failed. Then again it failed when Intel failed to deliver cool chips.

We now have REAL Macs for the first time.

You know what AMD/Intel blowhards were saying just 2-3 years ago on forums and socials? They said no way can Apple make chips for desktop level computing. HAHA.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: oldmacs
I've given up on these yearly 'upgrades' now. They cause issues each time and I then have to wait for my other software to catch up (or pay for upgrades to those licenses too!). Not enough in it for me to bother upgrading the entire OS. I'd rather they ditch the yearly upgrade cycle, and spend extra time making sure a release is as stable as possible before deploying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgbr and DPUser
I've given up on these yearly 'upgrades' now. They cause issues each time and I then have to wait for my other software to catch up (or pay for upgrades to those licenses too!). Not enough in it for me to bother upgrading the entire OS. I'd rather they ditch the yearly upgrade cycle, and spend extra time making sure a release is as stable as possible before deploying it.
Agreed… but then how could they force people into the “latest and greatest” mentality. I don’t care so much about new functionality as much as security patches. They’re a part of my life IRL. I’ve got a MBP 2015 that still suits my needs that I actually just upgraded to 1TB. Shortening the upgrade cycle is just a push like Windows 11 to upgrade.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ifti
I've given up on these yearly 'upgrades' now. They cause issues each time and I then have to wait for my other software to catch up (or pay for upgrades to those licenses too!). Not enough in it for me to bother upgrading the entire OS. I'd rather they ditch the yearly upgrade cycle, and spend extra time making sure a release is as stable as possible before deploying it.
Agreed, but like the above user said, the real concern is security updates. When your Mac stop to support the latest macOS it mean you have 2 more years before your machine become obsolete for Apple and THAT is the real concern I have.

Otherwise I also agree to stop yearly major OS releases and just go back like before when a new major OS release actually meant something.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: CK1Czar and Ifti
Not to be overly pessimistic, but I think it's pretty clear now that this is the last Intel macOS release.

Monterey supports 2013 and newer. Ventura's cutoff is 2017. That's 4 years of models dropped this year. Considering the cylinder Mac Pro an outlier makes it 3 years. Either way, that brings us to 2020 at next WWDC.

Why kill so many capable machines and then not commit to it? The way I see the strategy, Ventura halves the Intel support list, and macOS 14 finishes the job, making it seem more gradual than if 5+ years of models are unsupported all at once. It wouldn't make sense to anger so many people this year for no reason.

And... I wouldn't be sure about Apple Silicon, either. If they do kill Intel in 2023, I'd bet on them taking advantage of this "new normal" product lifespan, and unsupporting M1 in 2024-2025. We can probably expect 4 years going forward.

Really hoping I'm wrong, but cynicism seems to be the right approach to modern Apple. Absolutely fantastic products, undeniably greedy company :(
Iphone 7 got booted after less than 3 years ...
 
Apple is just speeding up the transition to an Apple Silicon only version of macOS, as they did when transitioning from PowerPC to Intel. TBH, nothing we couldn't predict in the beginning. People started asking immediately to Apple's SVPs for how long they would support Intel Macs, and the only answer we got was "years". To me that says it all. Would not be surprised to see macOS 14 being the last version for Intel Macs. I believe Apple Silicon Macs will be supported for longer, as we see on iPads and iPhones. They're also more powerful machines than the mobile devices...
 
Apple is just speeding up the transition to an Apple Silicon only version of macOS, as they did when transitioning from PowerPC to Intel. TBH, nothing we couldn't predict in the beginning. People started asking immediately to Apple's SVPs for how long they would support Intel Macs, and the only answer we got was "years". To me that says it all. Would not be surprised to see macOS 14 being the last version for Intel Macs. I believe Apple Silicon Macs will be supported for longer, as we see on iPads and iPhones. They're also more powerful machines than the mobile devices...
Or it means that the Intel Macs will only receive OS updates for 5 years. The question then is when does that countdown start? I do believe that we will see more and more new features that are AS only with Intel Macs just getting simple features or no new features at all, eventually.
 
Iphone 7 got booted after less than 3 years ...
I make it a habit to know when a device was first released and will not purchase it more than 2 years after release, and only if on sale. It has served me well for the past 13 years. I end up being the purchaser for my family who has mbps, ipads, iphones, watches, and mac minis. We only upgrade devices after 3-8 years so we tend to hold onto stuff (and I try to get a good deal).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr_Charles_Forbin
I make it a habit to know when a device was first released and will not purchase it more than 2 years after release, and only if on sale. It has served me well for the past 13 years. I end up being the purchaser for my family who has mbps, ipads, iphones, watches, and mac minis. We only upgrade devices after 3-8 years so we tend to hold onto stuff (and I try to get a good deal).
Yeah, surprisingly my in-laws have to upgrade their 2012 mini and it’s not because of Apple, it’s because of TurboTax. Turbo Tax now only runs on Big Sur and higher. I was hoping to be able to move all the data off my 2014 mini (I hardly use it) and pass it over to them so they can get a few more years of life out of it but I’m not quite ready to make that call yet plus my wife is insistent that we keep a desktop (that she never uses, of course) so they’ll make the buy. Fortunately Cyber Monday is coming.
 
I wish no more Intel Mac support just because I hate the Intel era.

It was important to move from PPC to Intel because Motorola-IBM were not delivering.

But a Mac isn’t a real Mac if it has PC hardware inside it.

Now we have real Macs again. It’s even more Mac than the Motorola era because now it is pure Apple Mac.
I agree with you but so far the M chip macs have no upgradability, no ram, hd etc. It’s a mixed blessing. Plus I find Ventura to be one the modern road apples lol. Buggy as hell, settings menu is horrible. Hopefully apple fixes their many mistakes, windows 11 machines starting to look pretty good. Monterey is so much better!
 
I've given up on these yearly 'upgrades' now. They cause issues each time and I then have to wait for my other software to catch up (or pay for upgrades to those licenses too!). Not enough in it for me to bother upgrading the entire OS. I'd rather they ditch the yearly upgrade cycle, and spend extra time making sure a release is as stable as possible before deploying it.
Exactly!!! Ventura is crap!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifti and alpez
How sad that Apple is reducing support rather than extending in today's world where we really should be extending the life of everything to benefit the planet.

What's worse is that machines that Apple is dropping are more than capable of running the latest. I type this from a Mid 2012 MacBook Pro which is running Ventura.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.