I expect iPad 2 to have higher res., faster CPU, more memory, and whatever bells and whistles apple decides to throw in.
Then you clearly don't understand Apple. Apple is not the bells n' whistles, spec sheet win, company.
In fact that is the opposite of the way Apple works. Apple never leads on the spec sheet. They excel in giving you only what you really need.
I already feel sorry for the people who paid $500+ for the current iPads.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)
We will NOT Have any other resolution than a doubled one.
Apps would scale badly and it would screw over iPad 1 owners
USB?? Can't really see that happening. Not if they can make an extra $30 on an adapter.
Eh - why not? Apple's already got their eye on USB 3, so it could be something in conjunction with that. But if so, the iPad 2 won't be out until 2011.
http://www.mopo.ca/2010/11/apple-foregoing-usb-3-0-for-light-peak-in-early-2011/
Apple wants to stay ahead of the curve - iPhone was stagnant at 480 x 320 and that gave android an "in" - apple needs to take advantage of the fact that they'll likely sell 40 million next year, by using economies of scale to get higher spec'ed parts at reasonable prices.
I expect iPad 2 to have higher res., faster CPU, more memory, and whatever bells and whistles apple decides to throw in.
I wouldn't expect to see anything having to do with a new iPad until March/April 2011. Apple tends to like yearly cycles for this stuff (like the iPhone and iPod).What are your thoughts on Apple's strategy to unveil a new iPad so close after Christmas? Isn't that just going to piss a lot of people off?
What are your thoughts on Apple's strategy to unveil a new iPad so close after Christmas? Isn't that just going to piss a lot of people off?
Remember, with Apple likely ordering the production of over 40 million 2G iPads, that makes it very viable for the touchscreen manufacturer to offer 1280x768 or 1280x960 resolution at a very reasonable price,
MythicFrost said:I highly doubt they'll increase the resolution because that'd require developers supporting both iPad 1 and iPad 2, which means more work. If Apple does anything, they'll do what they did with the iPhone 4 and double the resolution -- it's seamless and requires little effort from developers.However, you're forgetting that Apple chose the 1024x768 resolution on its touchscreen for another reason: cost. Going beyond a 1024x768 resolution touchscreen would have made the iPad just too expensive for the price point Jobs wanted for the device at the time.
But now that production costs with suppliers are probably lower, Apple could get reasonable pricing on 1280x768 or 1280x960 touchscreens for the 2G iPad. Going to a higher resolution--which will of course require an update to iOS 4.x--allows for better quality display graphics, better looking text, and native display of 720p HD video downloaded through the iTunes Store and copied to the iPad through iTunes.
rdstoll said:WOW. A USB port. Will certainly be worth spending $700 on an upgrade!