Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Penryns are supposed to be more expensive than the current Xeons too, right?
Yeah, that's kind of what I was thinking. Penryns are supposed to be more expensive than the current Xeons too, right?
No they are not. The price match while offering more speed and cache in a the smaller 45nm package.
This is if Apple go with the 1333MHz FSB processors. If they go with 1600MHz processors then they are more expensive, though I would still expect a $2,499 base price.