Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Next MacOS name...(Let's have some fun for the next month...)

I think it is macOS Mammoth.

Mammoth Mountain was part of the Sierra National Forrest. Eastern portions of Sierra National Forest became the Inyo and Toiyabe National Forests.

Apple used
"Yosemite" (National Forrest) for OS X 10.10.x,
"El Capitan" (in the Yosemite National Forrest) for OS X 10.11.x
and
"Sierra" (National Forrest) for macOS 10.12.x.

macOS 10.14.x is probably macOS "Sequoia".

mammoth.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffyTheQuik
My guess is 'macOS 11'. No more names, line it up with iOS and tvOS, it's the perfect opportunity. They are all currently 10.x. something so why not move them all to 11. Especially after renaming OS X -> macOS last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ck2875
Mr. Retrofire said:
I think it is macOS Mammoth.

Mammoth Mountain was part of the Sierra National Forrest. Eastern portions of Sierra National Forest became the Inyo and Toiyabe National Forests.

Apple used
"Yosemite" (National Forrest) for OS X 10.10.x,
"El Capitan" (in the Yosemite National Forrest) for OS X 10.11.x
and
"Sierra" (National Forrest) for macOS 10.12.x.

macOS 10.14.x is probably macOS "Sequoia".

Click to expand...
What about Mavericks?

I do like Mammoth!
[doublepost=1496578602][/doublepost]
dwfaust said:
La Jolla? Eureka? Death Valley?
Click to expand...
Yreka would be fun too!
[doublepost=1496579190][/doublepost]
junkmail509 said:
"Sausalito" would be a good name but probably cause same issues.
Click to expand...
If they ever used Washington names, I guess "Puyallup" would have the same issue...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back