Its super fast and responsive and last me until bed time.I like turtles
Its super fast and responsive and last me until bed time.I like turtles
Its super fast and responsive and last me until
🎥 'Zombie Kid' Jonathan Ware likes turtles - YouTube
On a device like the “iWatch” (OK, OK, it’s Apple Watch — distinctive Brand, I know…distinct and original…just like…iPod…) screen size is critically important.
I’d upgrade from my Series 8 to a 9 for a larger display.
Or significantly longer battery life (alone).
Either/or — or both.
right. it’s also interesting that the existing tech wasn’t mentioned once in the article lol. folks (who aren’t privy) want to know what they’re upgrading from.Would be great if the MR article detailed differences/benefits of microLED vs OLED…
Battery tech has remained unchanged with nothing imminent on the horizon on that front, so not sure what you are talking about.The Apple Watch Ultra is just not for me. (I’ve worn one and it was too encumbering for me — but I loved the larger screen and I can certainly see outdoorsmen and mountain climbers, et al. loving it.)
But you point out that the Ultra has 36 hours of battery life.
The non-Ultra new Series 9 Apple Watches have, at 18 hours, half the battery life of the Ultra.
I highly doubt Apple has found the “sweet spot” for battery life on the regular Apple Watch because short battery life is the number one complaint I hear and read about the “iWatch.”
Like I said, 24 hours completes one full day of sleep/wake activity monitoring.
Couldn’t they have given it even one minute more battery life than the 8?
Point is, I would’ve traded in every new (and upcoming) capability of the new Series 9 and readily bought a new one that only had substantially longer battery life.
(A dead battery equals zero features and capabilities.)
Because of this — and speaking only for myself — I‘ll be sticking with my 8 and won’t be buying a series 9.
(P.S. The Apple Watch used to be thicker and I didn’t hear any complaints. Battery tech has advanced since then, so a slightly thicker Series 9 would’ve afforded longer battery life.)
You’re right, I read the article as MiniLED like what my MacBook Pro has. HahaOLED has perfect blacks and, yes, higher contrast, but far lower brightness.
And despite what you read from reviewers who spend a short amount of time reviewing OLED TVs and other devices, OLED still has screen burn-in issues.
And as far as the O in OLED, the organic materials do degrade over time. (I’ve seen used OLED displays where ALL the organic material has left pixels the whole screen over and these dead pixels don’t illuminate at all. Color is all screwed up. It makes the skin and the colors on The Simpsons look normal.)
Not so with micro LED.
Like OLED, micro LED offers self-illuminating pixels for each individual pixel, which can each be turned off, yielding perfect blacks. And perfectly isolated as well, so zero blooming. And much brighter.
The only place I can see micro LED improving after this, is, perhaps, separate lighting of each R, G and B sub-pixel.
(And that would only be appreciable to the eye on a GIGANTIC screen.)
OLED will be obsolete and micro LED will replace it. (But it can’t be soon enough.)
btw, manufacturers have tried displays that added a Y sub-pixel for yellow to RGB or a W for pure white, but after this brief experiment, they’ve all been discontinued and returned to RGB.
No one has yet improved upon Red, Green and Blue sub-pixels in color quality and picture quality.
(But I’m certainly open to it.)
iPad Pro is Mini LED not micro. Big differenceI’m confused. I see many asking for OLED (which the AW currently is) and the iPad is rumoured to be moving from MicroLED to OLED. I don’t know why or how this is exciting news but maybe I’m just ignorant around it all.
Whoops. My bad. That’s why I was confused. 😂iPad Pro is Mini LED not micro. Big difference