It is kind of sad reading the responses. At least I understood the starting post form the beginning. Now I know why they always complain in the media about children who cannot read properly anymore.
worst idea ever man.
why not just make a multi touch comp instead?
Because this thread isn't about sci-fi wet dreams but about realistic next steps for the development of MacBooks.
Apple has display-touch interfaces on iPods, iPhones and iPads. They have developed a whole OS based on this technology! They are not going to be happy with having just a grey box for their slick touch interface on their laptops and desktops, they are going to want to bring the functionality of the iOS to the Macs. I would have though this was self evident after the last keynote where they went on at length about how you can't have a vertical touch screen, it has to be horizontal... the dots are right there... and you think its the worst idea ever? Really?![]()
just because somethings realistic doesn't mean its a god idea. what you're suggesting will never be.
If you need to re-focus to two different depths all the time, your eyes will get tired very quickly. If you're not using a laptop, you also need to move your neck up and down, moving only your eyes isn't enough.
On laptops the problem isn't as great, but for those of us using a Mac mini, iMac or Mac Pro, it would be terrible.
worst idea ever man.
why not just make a multi touch comp instead?
I see your point, yes, your desktop screen is, in general, quite a bit further away from you than your mouse/magic pad would be. We have seen the patent applications from Apple for a tilting desktop screen so they may go with that rout to provide iOS multi-touch integration into desktop displays but I still think that a display-track-pad is going to make its way into MacBooks sooner or later.