Soccer as per the English rules was designed to intentionally create a sport that taught no practical combat skill to natives of English colonies. That is why it is weak in the States. Teach those "filed ball kickers" to do more than run and kick, then the game is worth something other than a pacification indoctrination.
That is absolute garbage. If you're trying to argue a point, maybe you ought to do a little historical research first...
Football wasn't some artificial creation to keep "the colonials" passive. It is a centuries old game. There are references to the game as far back as the 1500s in Cambridge University annals to the game of "footeball". Codification of the rules of the game came about gradually and organically. Originally every team played by their own specific rules, with many variations about things such as number of players, size of the pitch, legal & illegal tackles, etc. Some allowed you to handle or even carry the ball (more of which later).
Gradually, teams and schools near each other (who tended to play each other more regularly) would agree a mutually acceptable set of rules for when they played. Slowly, these agreements spread until, in 1863, there was an effort from the clubs worldwide to reach an overall agreement on one unified set of rules. Note: This was an effort purely from the sport itself, not some vast conspiracy to subjugate the rest of the world! This is where Association Football came into being. As for the name "soccer", this is a relatively recent (1880's) invention, deriving from the word Association and the trend to ad the modifier "-er" as a colloquialism. The game itself is generally held by the large majority of the world to be "Football".
Now: handling of the ball. At the time, as I said earlier, some teams allowed the handling and carrying of the ball. These teams followed the same path as above, eventually codifying the laws of the game of Rugby Football (in 1871).
American and Canadian Football are offshoots of this game (as are Aussie rules and Rugby League).