Late to the game regarding NFTs to be sure, but I stumbled upon some stuff that intrigued me, and re-woke some questions I had about NFTs. So I never really got the allure of NFTs. I get that they're nonfungible, and technically you own the digital image but its an asset that doesn't exist in physical form.
Bill Gates says crypto and NFTs are a sham
He mentions traditional physical assets, and for me (being old I suppose) makes sense. I also agree with Gates, that this falls into the greater fool theory
Take Jack Dorsey's first tweet. It was sold as an NFT for 2.9 million
Here's his first tweet that I found on twitter when I did a search. So why spend 2.9 million dollars for something that I or anyone else can either screen grab?
Looks like the buyer lost his money on that NFT. The last auction had a bid of 280 dollars - yikes!
‘Jack Dorsey’s First Tweet’ NFT Went on Sale for $48M. It Ended With a Top Bid of Just $280
Why Jack Dorsey’s First-Tweet NFT Plummeted 99% In Value In A Year
Ubisoft tried to get in on the action and was largely lampooned and failed
Ubisoft’s first NFT experiment was a dumpster fire
Honest question, what is the value in a digital image that people can screenshot? The use of a blockchain doesn't matter, its an image and screen prints exist - how could value be derived from it?
Bill Gates says crypto and NFTs are a sham
He mentions traditional physical assets, and for me (being old I suppose) makes sense. I also agree with Gates, that this falls into the greater fool theory
Those digital asset trends are “100% based on greater fool theory,” the Microsoft co-founder said Tuesday at a TechCrunch conference, referencing the notion that investors can make money on worthless or overvalued assets as long as people are willing to bid them higher.
Gates added that he’s “not long or short” crypto. And he mocked Bored Apes NFTs, joking that “expensive digital images of monkeys” will “improve the world immensely.”
...
Instead, Gates said he prefers old fashioned investing.
“I’m used to asset classes, like a farm where they have output, or like a company where they make products,” he said.
Take Jack Dorsey's first tweet. It was sold as an NFT for 2.9 million
Here's his first tweet that I found on twitter when I did a search. So why spend 2.9 million dollars for something that I or anyone else can either screen grab?
Looks like the buyer lost his money on that NFT. The last auction had a bid of 280 dollars - yikes!
‘Jack Dorsey’s First Tweet’ NFT Went on Sale for $48M. It Ended With a Top Bid of Just $280
Why Jack Dorsey’s First-Tweet NFT Plummeted 99% In Value In A Year
Ubisoft tried to get in on the action and was largely lampooned and failed
Ubisoft’s first NFT experiment was a dumpster fire
Honest question, what is the value in a digital image that people can screenshot? The use of a blockchain doesn't matter, its an image and screen prints exist - how could value be derived from it?