Hope we'll see some new shoe laces!
I different colors too! Like rose gold and space grey! Cue the innovation at Nike!
Hope we'll see some new shoe laces!
Yeah, in rose gold.Hope we'll see some new shoe laces!
Apparently you missed the 1980s?Rainbow laces would be amazing.
Lol--iterating like you read about. Keep doing you Tim Cook.Guess Nike plans to stop releasing new models for the next 3 years. Nike watch bands incoming .
Touchscreen-enabled running shoes? Unfortunately only includes non-removable Li-Po 1715 mAh batteries...Apple preparing to buy Nike? Wouldn't be the worst move and would be in line with their purchase of Beats
Yeah, in rose gold.
How do "captains of industry" like this guy have time to wear so many hats? There are only so many hours in a day. Are some of these "roles" just puffed up? Or does he sacrifice all personal life, work 18/7, etc?
Total shareholder returns are what count - share price gains and dividends.....couldn't care less about most admired. Most admired by whom? A bunch of journos or other overpaid, underperforming execs? Or non-shareholders perhaps?It's interesting where continuously growing profits that are historically and worldwide record breaking, with the company becoming the number one most valued company while still being one of the top most admired ones too somehow doesn't translate to "getting the right results for shareholders".
Sadly I think you are right, but that's the problem. Too many accountants and second rate people in charge of companies that could be so much more if only true leaders were in their place.It kind of seems like people have this rather imaginative view of what a CEO is. Yes, Jobs happened to be more unique (partially because he was also the founder of it all), but that's basically really more of an exception than the rule. Perhaps that should be the case--in the sense that CEOs really should be these very passionate people about their companies and should be perfectionists and driving forces for products and services and basically everything that the company does--but that's not really the reality of it all.
If cash is king then Apple certainly is doing beyond well with that. And are we somehow saying that the stock hasn't done well under Tim Cook? Where is it compared to where it was when Steve Jobs left? And are we really going to try to split hairs on most admired or most valued or something like that based on sub-dividing it into some sub-sections and splitting off some aspects of this or that? Seems like people know where things stand fairly well.Total shareholder returns are what count - share price gains and dividends.....couldn't care less about most admired. Most admired by whom? A bunch of journos or other overpaid, underperforming execs? Or non-shareholders perhaps?
All that cash (profit by the way is irrelevant, it can be manipulated in the accounts, only cash is king) and yet so few new desirable, innovative, cash-generating products............
Well, world peace could also be achievable, as are many many other things if only reality was different in this way or that way.Sadly I think you are right, but that's the problem. Too many accountants and second rate people in charge of companies that could be so much more if only true leaders were in their place.
No new nike shoes for two years.
Lol Cook can't even run Apple and here he is trying to run the US government and now part of Nike. Tim lacks laser focus, which shows. Apple's product lines are bloated and old. Steve Jobs came back to Apple and cleaned up the product lines. I think we need Steve 2.0 to fix Apple.
No matter how many times this is said, it still won't be true.I haven't seen Apple create any amazing new products under his leadership, and if anything Apple's product line is as weak as it's ever been.