As I have said, I have a Fuji X100, but that doesn't mean that I can't join the party and buy into a new system.

I sold my Nikon DSLR and don't currently have a "system camera" at all.
I'd consider a Nikon V1 (or something more "pro" that comes out in the future) if they released some fast, thin primes. They have the size advantage, and a MASSIVE autofocus advantage. Heck, the AF issue is the one thing that prevents small cameras from really threatening DSLRs, and Nikon seems to have solved that. Too bad they didn't go with a camera sensor with a 2.0x crop factor.
Panny and Olympus have the most prime, pancake lens options. I mean, I'd be immediately interested in the 14 mm f/2.5, 20 mm f/1.7, and 45 mm f/1.8. They have more, but I don't want the others.
Sony has a 16 mm f/2.8, but it's just too wide. As I said, Sony may have the smallest, thinnest cameras with the largest lenses because they have a very short flange distance. Unfortunately, this may be preventing them from making small lenses (not based on any information, just a guess).
Samsung has a 30 mm f/2.x and 16 mm f/2.4 (and a 20 mm f/2.8), which I didn't know about until just now! Looks like Samsung also has some decent lens options! It's a shame then that the images suck.
And Pentax Q is a joke. They even call their lenses "Toy Lenses". WTF?
