Of course if Sony or Microsoft were in Nintendo's shoes in the 80's we'd have Little Big Planet, Wipeout, Halo in primordial form. That's just the way franchises are.
Yeah, I pull out my Playstation exclusively for GTA V/Online these days myself!
Indeed, I do like to see more Wipeout (I loved HD), despite them being minor updates aside from graphics. The core gameplay is just so solid in those long running titles, I suppose that is the reason they remain so popular!
I don't deny the greatness of Super Mario Galaxy games, as the consensus is very high, despite I having never played them myself. I must admit I was confused when I saw IGN name it as game of the year over Fallout 3 (
Possibly my favourite PC game of all time) a few years back. Here I was blown away by a huge dark open world RPG with tremendous depth, and then it was beaten by what seemed to me at the time like some sort of N64 clone of a plumber flying through space solving colourful puzzles.
😛
----------
Don't forget that we buy Nintendo consoles because we want to play Nintendo games.
I have been suspecting that is the only reason Nintendo is still around in the last few years
😉.
That is true that people like to milk franchises, although I would have similar disdain for COD and Fifa etc..
GTA seems to do the same thing admittedly every time, but each revision they up the graphics considerably, add usually 100's of new things to do, and with V they added an ambitious online mode (which I have found to be my favourite open multiplayer game ever, having never enjoyed MMO's). Rockstar set themselves tremendous challenges and for the most part seem to deliver. Red Dead Redemption for example takes experience from GTA, but turns it into a borderline oscar worthy western.
I don't mean to single out Nintendo for franchise milking, just curious as to how they could make themselves more appealing to those who see them as not as serious as Sony or Microsoft.
🙂