Big mistake. Without firewire it is not suitable for a portable DAW. I am not going to buy it and hope my audio interfaces and external HDs work properly through an ethernet converter.
Meh, it's just like the non-inclusion of Blu-Ray.
They figure the majority doesn't use it on MacBook, or at all for that matter.
The minority always gets screwed by the majority.
I mean, we do realize that technically USB 2.0 is faster than FW400, right?
I mean, we do realize that technically USB 2.0 is faster than FW400, right?
wow, i was planning on buying a new macbook to make use of an apogee duet or ensemble, now that they removed firewire, there is no reason for me to even bother buying a mac as I can't use those devices.
I'm sure apogee will be pissed about this too .
480 theoretical speed, depends on CPU load, vs. FW actually 400
Technically, yes.
In practice, it's dramatically inferior.
Macbook has Ethernet. Firewire 800 has an Ethernet converter. Cease b*tching.
Flash RAM is where camcorders are going. FireWire is needed for tape transfers (the old tech), everything else works fine with USB. Apple are skating where the puck is going to be again.No.
You have to use Firewire for capturing DV video. So basically, iMovie is useless on these new Macbooks unless you have one of those crappy hard drive cameras.
Is this true? I've heard rumors. Where can we get one?
Very true.
But you have to look at consumer standards.
Most people don't even know what Firewire is. USB though? That's about as household as dust.
Big mistake. Without firewire it is not suitable for a portable DAW. I am not going to buy it and hope my audio interfaces and external HDs work properly through an ethernet converter.
Loyal Apple users know what Firewire is though, it has been a part of Macs for so long, and because it was so much better than USB people started relying on it, for their audio/video equipment, external hard drives, etc..
Flash RAM is where camcorders are going. FireWire is needed for tape transfers (the old tech), everything else works fine with USB. Apple are skating where the puck is going to be again.
Currently yes, but did you notice the future tense in my post?No, actually, everyone still uses DV tapes (MiniDV and DVCAM being the big ones) because it is far better than using flash/HDD/DVD.
If you shoot video at all, this would become apparent quickly.
Using flash/hdd/DVD and you only have the available space on the camcorder itself/the media before you have to erase everything to shoot new stuff. Not very conducive to actual video production.
So, with that said, FireWire 400 being dropped is a:
HUGE DEAL!
Currently yes, but did you notice the future tense in my post?
Well apple aint exactly going for loyal apple fans are they? They are chasing after consumers now, what better way then a sexy laptop. I can guarentee you that 4/5 average consumers dont have a clue what firewire is.
It's pretty hit and miss with mac support if i last recall, i could be wrong, this was 2 years ago now, things might have changed by now.Do most miniDV cameras now support USB?
It wasn't the port itself that was the requirement, more that FireWire inclusion started on Macs with the required spec for Tiger. So it was easier just to check for the FireWire port and use that as the cut off point for support.Pretty pointless if you ask me, wasn't firewire once a requirement for Tiger? seems so silly to invest all that money into it, only to drop it...