its not an app...
Its only for ip4 to ip4 calling. When you make a call to a ip4 a facetime button replaces where the hold button was.![]()
That doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. There is no FaceTime app (unless you're talking about Phone.ipa and Contacts.ipa) and iChat is the name for the instant messengering program in Mac OS.iChat is probably another name for the FaceTime app, don't you think?
iChat is probably another name for the FaceTime app, don't you think?
the app store is already filled with instant messaging apps such as skype so ichat would sort of be useless, and facetime is an extremely simple implementation of video calling...so i think facetime is better to have than ichat
You don't have to use minutes in order to make/receive a Facetime call. You can do it from the screen options after calling someone, or you can go into the contact and initiate it by pressing "Facetime" without ever calling, going that route is entirely WiFi.
I'm assuming that iChat for the Mac will soon be updated so that it can connect with the iPhone's Facetime.
This is a Mac iChat issue. Not an iPhone issue.
There is ZERO need for 'iChat for iPhone.'
It was explained in the keynote, Facetime will only be available if both party's are connected via wifi, Jobs said it will eventually work over the GSM network but later in the year or even next year.
Coming in OS 10.7. It seems like Apple is done adding new features to existing operating systems.
Jobs said it will eventually work over the GSM network but later in the year or even next year.
Very good point. That raises the question, would Apple benefit from everyone using their implementation of video calls in the same way they benefit from people using Safari? Does Apple think that video calls will be a major form of communication in the future? I'm not so sure, I see it as a gimmick and not many people will use it, but only time will tell.Traditionally, yes, but if it helps create more of a reason for iPhone users to buy Macs (and vise versa) then they could make an exception in this case.
After all, they keep giving us new versions of Safari even though that's a "comes with the OS" bit of software. Why? Because it helps them in their war-for-HTML5. If there's a reason to do it, they'll update software between OS releases.
Traditionally, yes, but if it helps create more of a reason for iPhone users to buy Macs (and vise versa) then they could make an exception in this case.
After all, they keep giving us new versions of Safari even though that's a "comes with the OS" bit of software. Why? Because it helps them in their war-for-HTML5. If there's a reason to do it, they'll update software between OS releases.
Ha ha...
What's "the" GSM network you're talking about? My guess? One or two European countries. Is that what you meant by "the" network?
Very good point. That raises the question, would Apple benefit from everyone using their implementation of video calls in the same way they benefit from people using Safari? Does Apple think that video calls will be a major form of communication in the future? I'm not so sure, I see it as a gimmick and not many people will use it, but only time will tell.
Does Apple think that video calls will be a major form of communication in the future? I'm not so sure, I see it as a gimmick and not many people will use it, but only time will tell.
When I said "the" GSM network, I was referring to that FaceTime won't be restricted to use only wifi.