I didn't make a comment "towards you", nor did I criticize your post in any way, nor did I imply that any post is "better" than another. I simply made a statement to clarify for the OP that they don't have to delete the files if they don't want to. What they choose to do is up to them. There's no need to get emotional.
Seeing that you quoted my post, it's obvious you were referencing my comment. To say otherwise would either portray your lack of knowledge ont he definition of "referencing" a body of text.
With that said, I"m obviously implying your intentions and, judging by the rebuttal received from you and the aforementioned comment at hand, to simply think that you weren't replying to my statement would be, simply put, stupid.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just letting you know exactly what I stated in my previous comment. There's no reason to quote a helpful post and undermine it when it obviously has nothing but beneficial potential.
Hence my emphasis on getting over yourself. It's a forum. I didn't slight you, I didn't use any form of logic to undermine you or your opinion. I simply referenced YOUR post that lacked the information to inform the OP that the files would still be on the hard drive.
You implied that he didn't want to get them removed by omitting the directions to delete OR you simply did not think of referencing that. Just because I did doesn't mean I'm undermining your post or opinion.
Between the OP talking about how there is no space left on the internal drive and the use of the word transfer (to move something from one place to another) vs copy (to move a copy of something to another place, leaving the original intact) I think the OP's intent is quite clear.
And apparently there's a problem with referencing this assumption. Go figure.