Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
bad move by Apple. At this moment Apple is in no position to gain more enemies. it's time to waive the white flag and start gaining territory before it's realize that Google and Samsung are the leaders in innovation (even if both are crappy technologies and ugly hardware)
 
Hmm, I have quite the opposite experience. With Pandora, I never discovered any new music I enjoyed. Ever. I was always given music I knew of or didn't like. With iTunes Radio, I've gotten about 6 new bands in a very limited amount of listening.

Maybe I'm weird. :)


Totally agree. I listen to pandora when I want to hear songs I like. However, iTunes Radio lets me hear artists I've never heard before or maybe missed out on. iTunes Radio has three options per station. One of which is play only hit music. Then a mix of hit and non hits. And third is discovery of new stations. That part works well. However pandora has the best algorithm and fewer bugs.

iTunes Radio can sometimes play the same song twice in a row. Even if you did or didn't like it. It also tends to play songs you didn't like days later. Apple needs to fix this.

----------

bad move by Apple. At this moment Apple is in no position to gain more enemies. it's time to waive the white flag and start gaining territory before it's realize that Google and Samsung are the leaders in innovation (even if both are crappy technologies and ugly hardware)

Um what?

Pandora is a direct competitor. If you want it you can download the app and play it through the car. Apple didn't want to waste on integration.

You really aren't losing out.
 
Apple made a big mistake on this one by only allowing certain apps CarPlay integration. If an app is allowed in the App Store, its developers should have access to the CarPlay APIs, period. Apple already controls the App Store. I'm not sure why they felt the need to handcuff a new feature that's designed to add even more value to iOS devices. Consumers should be able to choose the in-car experience they want from their iOS devices and developers should be given the ability to provide that experience to their customers.
 
In a statement to MacRumors, Pandora said that although its service was not integrated into CarPlay, Apple "continues to be a valued partner."

yeah because at any given time Apple will get medieval on your ass.

I've tried ALL the players. I even went so far as to use VPN for services I couldn't try in Japan. I tried the iOS and DT versions. iTunes is so much better it's not even a contest. I have introduced a LOT of Japanese friends to iTunes Radio and set up US accounts for them so they can use it all day. They frikkin love it.

On some of the rarer stuff you can get more frequent repeats but the songs are songs I really like anyway so it's no big deal. Or I simply click "don't play again' if I don't like it. Rarely happens.

I hardly stream from my 4TB of external HDD now. I usually just create a radio station from my songs that are on that external HDD and it's the same thing.

I would like lossless ALAC but oh well.
 
Last edited:
Whatever happened to buying a song and owning it forever. I dont like ghe spotify and pandora models. I just rather buy a song for .99 and own it.

"People don't want to rent their music". -Steve Jobs

Agreed. I'd rather own my music than sign up for one of those premium music services.
 
iTunes radio blew it for me when I was listening to smooth jazz and they snuck in a Norah Jones album. Really? Willie Nelson would fit better.

Spotify has very loud commercials and usually the same crap over and over, plus they try really hard to make you share with all your friends what you're listening to.

I don't know what it is about Pandora though, I've used it on multiple platforms and never liked it. I still don't! For the most part, I don't like those "tell us what you like and we'll play music for you" services because what really happens is you ask for something good, and then they feed you a bunch of songs from 99 cent CDs you find at Ross.

Most of the time, the music isn't even exactly relevant for me :\
 
People often assume that the way that they do things or in this case consume things is the way everyone does it.

I don't like any of the streaming services, because for me, an album is meant to be consumed as a whole item, i.e. each song is a chapter. I imagine the artist agonizing about the right order of the songs, etc.

I know that that is not true of all (even most) albums, but most of what I listen to is artists that make music that I like. I couldn't imagine buying one song by itself, because either I like the artist or I don't. And of course, some songs even by my favorite artists are obviously better than others.

So, even using iTunes radio is weird for me because I'm not a fan of radio in the first place. It's kind of jarring for me to bounce from one artist to another. I'm probably very much in the minority here.

So, does that make someone who likes pandora wrong? No. They just consume differently. So, more power to the spotify's and pandora's of the world. They must be working for some people.

You do realize that you can listen to entire albums on Spotify? Spotify you can play whatever you want. It's very rare that I can't find an album I want to listen to on there.

----------

bad move by Apple. At this moment Apple is in no position to gain more enemies. it's time to waive the white flag and start gaining territory before it's realize that Google and Samsung are the leaders in innovation (even if both are crappy technologies and ugly hardware)

How does Samsung innovate on anything? They pack a bunch of hardware into an oversized phone shell and add a few gimmicky features or Apple knockoffs.
 
Pandora has by far the best "station" algorithm out there. Far better than iRadio, which is at the bottom of the barrel, in my experience.

Who cares?

People will just skip until they get the song they want.

Algorithms will also get smarter each time people do that.
 
Whatever happened to buying a song and owning it forever. I dont like ghe spotify and pandora models. I just rather buy a song for .99 and own it.

I was one of them. But quickly changed my mind after I started to use Spotify. I have hardly bought any song ever since.
 
Whatever happened to buying a song and owning it forever. I dont like ghe spotify and pandora models. I just rather buy a song for .99 and own it.

In stead of looking at it from the ownership point of view, I would recommend you to look at it from the experience point of view and the value to your music listening experience. The beauty of Spotify (and others) is that for a low basic fee you get to discover a vastly larger amount of music, that you normally would not access due to budget limits (unless you don't care and are wealthy). I have discovered many new bands and listen to much more music than before.

It doesn't cost me anything extra to take an hour per day to listen to large amounts of new music. And the beauty of paying that small fee is that I don't get the advertisements and can even download songs to listen to them offline.
 
And so the failing begins. The sever lack of app support and lack of aftermarket installation will seriously hurt CarPlay ( worst name ever ) from succeeding.
 
People often assume that the way that they do things or in this case consume things is the way everyone does it.

....

So, even using iTunes radio is weird for me because I'm not a fan of radio in the first place. It's kind of jarring for me to bounce from one artist to another. I'm probably very much in the minority here.

So, does that make someone who likes pandora wrong? No. They just consume differently. So, more power to the spotify's and pandora's of the world. They must be working for some people.

I prefer hearing the road noise and the engine with no radio the majority of the time when I drive, mostly audiobooks the rest and if I couldn't listen to music again the rest of my life I really wouldn't feel like I'm missing out on much. I'm probably very much in the minority too.
 
I resent the word being used to describe these services as "radio". Neither iTunes Radio, Pandora, Spotify, Beats, MOG..... yadda yadda are not really radio, they are simple music jukeboxes.

Radio stations, even those who mostly play non stop music, offer far more than a just streamed set of tracks. They offer companionship, personality, interaction, news, traffic and other utility functions which all make the user experience of listening to a radio station completely different. While radio is ubiquitous, and free, the opportunity for listeners to consume streaming audio is also more limited, either because of the lack of proximity to internet access/3G/LTE or just the cost of accessing on a mobile device through subscription fees or even expensive hardware costs.

If you want to listen to on-demand music, that's fine, but it's not radio and it really bugs me when people refer to them as so.

I'm more interested in if something like TuneIn which allows people to listen to thousands of proper radio stations via the internet will work on CarPlay.




Disclosure: I am a radio presenter.
 
Last edited:
No Pandora support where I live anyway, so don't care.

Luckily Spofity is available and also will be supported in CarPlay, so I'm happy! :)
 
Apple made a big mistake on this one by only allowing certain apps CarPlay integration. If an app is allowed in the App Store, its developers should have access to the CarPlay APIs, period. Apple already controls the App Store. I'm not sure why they felt the need to handcuff a new feature that's designed to add even more value to iOS devices. Consumers should be able to choose the in-car experience they want from their iOS devices and developers should be given the ability to provide that experience to their customers.

How do we know they won't open it up more in the future? And it's the car, people should be focusing on driving, not fiddling around with apps on the dash.

----------

And so the failing begins. The sever lack of app support and lack of aftermarket installation will seriously hurt CarPlay ( worst name ever ) from succeeding.
Good grief, Apple just announced this. Isn't it a bit premature to be digging its grave already? Just because it's launching now with just a few apps doesn't mean Apple won't open it up to developers in the future. Is Touch ID a failure because there are no 3rd party APIs for it right now?
 
Whatever happened to buying a song and owning it forever. I dont like ghe spotify and pandora models. I just rather buy a song for .99 and own it.

Today's music is disposable in my opnion. It's not bad, but it's not great either. It's entertaining, it's fun for like a couple of months and then you are over it. I think that's a big reason why streaming services gained popularity.

For me I still buy what I think is great 'keeper' music, but I have to be honest with you, a lot of the new music I learned about in Pandora, stayed in Pandora.
 
iTunes Radio is already so far ahead of Pandora that nobody will want CarPlay support for the latter soon to be dead service.

Soon to be dead? How soon? Already so far ahead? says who? you? They just started less than a year ago, and they are only available on iDevices.

Pandora is cross platform, cross devices. I would argue no other streaming service is available as much as Pandora is. It's already in cars, TVs, Phones, PCs, tablets, and other devices.
 
As said, it's because iTunes Radio and Pandora are direct competitors. Or to be more clear, Apple blatantly ripped off Pandora in a way even more blatant than Apple accuses Samsung of ripping themselves off. It's really a shame Pandora doesn't have the resources to go after Apple. It's very sad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.