If Apple had upped the PPI, I would have been staying up late to get an early pre-order in. Now, I might just skip it altogether.
The (bigger) iPad Pro is at 264 PPI and the iPhones Plus are at 401. Continuing the 9.7" iPad(s) at 264 is just unacceptable, IMO.
And the higher PPI is great for when you hold your phone close to your face. How close do you hold the iPad?
This has been argued beyond ad infinitum here. Let me just say that not everybody has 20/20 vision. Many have 20/15, 20/10...
This has been argued beyond ad infinitum here. Let me just say that not everybody has 20/20 vision. Many have 20/15, 20/10...
Boy, it must s*ck to be you.
Guess you have to wait a little longer then.
Think you meant to quote the other guy?
I fixed it...I had the right message picked before tapping reply but something went wrong
Boy, it must s*ck to be you. /sarcasm/
Guess you have to wait a little longer then.
I thought the ipad may be 4k, the 13 inch will be next time probably.
If Apple had upped the PPI, I would have been staying up late to get an early pre-order in. Now, I might just skip it altogether.
The (bigger) iPad Pro is at 264 PPI and the iPhones Plus are at 401. Continuing the 9.7" iPad(s) at 264 is just unacceptable, IMO.
If Apple had upped the PPI, I would have been staying up late to get an early pre-order in. Now, I might just skip it altogether.
The (bigger) iPad Pro is at 264 PPI and the iPhones Plus are at 401. Continuing the 9.7" iPad(s) at 264 is just unacceptable, IMO.
I agree. Ridiculous that my old ass Kindle Fire HDX still has better resolution than the latest iPad. And trust me, when you're watching a movie, you most certainly do notice the difference.
If Apple had upped the PPI, I would have been staying up late to get an early pre-order in. Now, I might just skip it altogether.
The (bigger) iPad Pro is at 264 PPI and the iPhones Plus are at 401. Continuing the 9.7" iPad(s) at 264 is just unacceptable, IMO.
You hold the iPad further away, so the number is different.
And why the iPad Pro 13 has the same 264ppi? I think you will look closely to the 9,7 model compared to the 12.9" but why both have the same resolution?
And why the iPhone Plus has 401ppi (with bigger screen) compared to the 324ppi of the normal iPhone 6S?
Trust me, it's only a commercial number, the Pro9,7 has a down-clocked CPU/GPU, for that the screen res is the same as the Air. Because more pixel is equal to more CPU/GPU power, and Apple can't add a lot of more power inside the same case of the Air2, due to heat problem. Only for that the Pro9,7 has this "low res" display. I'm pretty sure the new Pro 2 will have a 2x res display with the new TSMC chip bult with 7nm process and less heat (due to the smaller size of the internal bits).
At the moment it's impossible make a 2x res display of the iPad Pro 9,7 with the same A9x in the same Air 2 case. And Apple can't something like "1,2x or 1.5x" display because it should make a weird use of the pixel in the UI (with a lot of problem for the sharpness due to not a double increase of the GUI elements).
It's not a big deal, it should be very fast with this resolution and a very powerful chip.
If Apple had upped the PPI, I would have been staying up late to get an early pre-order in. Now, I might just skip it altogether.
The (bigger) iPad Pro is at 264 PPI and the iPhones Plus are at 401. Continuing the 9.7" iPad(s) at 264 is just unacceptable, IMO.