Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm just pointing out the difference between 'Meta spying on you' and 'paying to have Apple spy on you.' I don't think they're equal at all.

Apple isn’t spying on you, that’s why you have to pay them.

Spying on you is meta’s entire business model
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget and RichTF
There is zero privacy in WhatsApp. I joined recently as I am involved in evaluating some equipment for a manufacturer. Since then, I have received several text messages from businesses on WhatsApp trying to sell me something.

But it is a Meta product, so I guess I should have expected that sort of action.
The reason why I won’t touch it. Zuck is much worse than Google.

I know scammers absolutely love it. Every time a scammer wants to talk it’s can you message me on WhatsApp
 
  • Like
Reactions: FatLouie
do you have a link to something I can read?

 


nothing in there says that apple was actually spying on anyone

"Users claimed they saw ads on their phones for specific brands after discussing them aloud, and others said their devices listened to them without them having said anything at all."

people imagine that this happens to them all of the time. thanks to google and meta, advertisers know them better then they know themselves so of course they are going to get targeted ads for the same things they are talking about

no one actually showed that what the lawsuit claimed actually ever happened
 
I wish Signal would catch on. As things are, my non-American friends and coworkers use WhatsApp and my non-iPhone American friends use sms/rcs. If Apple made an Android iMessage app, they'd probably corner the US market pretty quickly.
 
nothing in there says that apple was actually spying on anyone

"Users claimed they saw ads on their phones for specific brands after discussing them aloud, and others said their devices listened to them without them having said anything at all."

people imagine that this happens to them all of the time. thanks to google and meta, advertisers know them better then they know themselves so of course they are going to get targeted ads for the same things they are talking about

no one actually showed that what the lawsuit claimed actually ever happened
So Apple paid 95 million dollars for nothing? You should be their lawyer, would have saved them close to 100 million dollars.
 
I wish Signal would catch on. As things are, my non-American friends and coworkers use WhatsApp and my non-iPhone American friends use sms/rcs. If Apple made an Android iMessage app, they'd probably corner the US market pretty quickly.
My non-American friends/family use LINE which is even worst that Whatsapp. My American friends insist on using FB Messenger which is worst than both. Signal is great but no one I know uses it.
 
Id like to think that it's to expand it's utility. In reality it's probably a stealth applet designed for more Meta data collection.

It clearly is a way to put social pressure on people who aren’t using WhatsApp.

Currently if you don’t want to use WhatsApp you just don’t install it and can forgot about it. People who want to contact you will find another way (something standard that everyone has such as email/phone/SMS). .

With this, you friend/family/colleague will send you a link with an online WhatsApp chat which is annoying for you as this isn’t your application of choice and you won’t have a history of the discussion, and the whole setup will make you seems rude if you refuse to use it.

The idea is probably that after a while such people will eventually get tired of those annoying web chats, relent, and create a WhatsApp account to stop receiving those requests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lionel77
So Apple paid 95 million dollars for nothing? You should be their lawyer, would have saved them close to 100 million dollars.

they paid 95 million dollars to shoo away a fly. probably less than 1% of their legal budget for a year

either way, no one actually showed that anything happened
 
Great points.

While Apple isn't perfect when it comes to privacy, it would've been much better for privacy if Apple had acquired WhatsApp instead of Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg is a villanous scumbag who does not take privacy seriously.

Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014. I wonder if Steve Jobs had not died in 2011, would Apple have acquired WhatsApp sooner than Facebook did. Tim Cook is not a products person, so it’s no surprise that he was clueless on how dominant WhatsApp was at the time and how it was on track to growing even larger.
At the time I believe it would have been enough just to make iMessage into a cross platform app.

They probably thought that they would be helping Android which seemed short slighted to me. Android was destined to be very relevant just by design. It was unavoidable.
 
Great points.

While Apple isn't perfect when it comes to privacy, it would've been much better for privacy if Apple had acquired WhatsApp instead of Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg is a villanous scumbag who does not take privacy seriously.

Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014. I wonder if Steve Jobs had not died in 2011, would Apple have acquired WhatsApp sooner than Facebook did. Tim Cook is not a products person, so it’s no surprise that he was clueless on how dominant WhatsApp was at the time and how it was on track to growing even larger.

What would apple do with what's app when they already have iMessage/FaceTime?
 
Anyone know the reasoning why WhatsApp don't allow starting a new chat with a non-contact?

so irritating. I know the wa.me url option but should be simple
 
Anyone know the reasoning why WhatsApp don't allow starting a new chat with a non-contact?

so irritating. I know the wa.me url option but should be simple
I don‘t know, I’m not using it. But maybe Mark Z. wants to know the name, address AND the phone number…:)

H.
 
Whatapp works on those, it works on anything connected to an internet, so I don't know what you're talking about.


I'm just pointing out the difference between 'Meta spying on you' and 'paying to have Apple spy on you.' I don't think they're equal at all.
Look I'm glad that you're happy using Meta apps; you're certainly not alone in that. But the fact is that WhatsApp is ENTIRELY proprietary, which was your big gripe about iMessage. If using open software is something you care about, as you appear to, then you should use something that is actually open, like XMPP.... definitely not a fully proprietary, obviously data-harvesting app like WhatsApp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget

Old news. Very old news. Class action motivated fraud suits. Should we discuss the details of what actually happened?
 
which I will ignore

if someone has my number they can call or text me

Sure I agree people should not try to impose a non-standard messaging protocol to others.

But while I obviously have no inside information from WhatsApp I suspect it will work as follows:

You will receive a text message or email saying something along the lines of “Your friend John has sent you a message on WhatsApp. To see their message and continue chatting with John without a WhatsApp account, click on this link”.

So if you want to check-out what they said and see if it is important, you will have to click on the link.

And from your friend’s side, if you just ignore it will show on their WhatsApp App as if they sent you a message and you never replied. Making you come across as rude and/or uninteresting in engaging with them.

This is not a method I endorse to be clear, but I think something like this would be enough to coerce a good number of people who have been resisting WhatsApp into clicking on the links, and eventually create an account as they get tired of using the once-off web chats.
 
Last edited:
Seems like a new way for spammers and scammers to contact me even though I have uninstalled the app.
 
So if you want to know check-out what they said and see if it is important, you will have to click on the link.

And from your friend’s side, if you just ignore it will show on their WhatsApp App as if they sent you a message and you never replied. Making you come across as rude and/or uninteresting in engaging with them.

yeah I just won't click on the link

if I know who it is and have their number I would ask them to text me like a normal person

they can think I'm rude if they want

I don't really understand the point of what's app
 
Last edited:
What would apple do with what's app when they already have iMessage/FaceTime?
Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014, and Apple should’ve done so before that. WhatsApp didn’t have voice calling until 2015, and didn’t have video calling until 2016, so it was never a competitor to FaceTime at the time of acquisition. As for iMessage, Apple could’ve either integrated it into iMessage or left it as a standalone app in order to prevent a much more evil company—especially one as evil as Facebook—from becoming the very top dominant player in the text messaging space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dkh587
so apple should have bought what's app just so Facebook could not?

is that what you are saying?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.