non-corporate photos

Discussion in 'Apple Watch' started by Technodynamic, Feb 6, 2015.

  1. Technodynamic macrumors 6502

    Technodynamic

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    #1
    Thought I'd put together a handful of photos that are candid, not ultra premium photoshopped ones from Apple. Courtesy of Google:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. MarcoCapa macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2013
    #2
    Great topic
    I will search something to add.... Hodinkee if I can suggest have some good pics
     
  3. leenak macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    #3
    I hope all of those are the 42mm because those are huge (except maybe red one second to last? but hard to tell)
     
  4. The Doctor11 macrumors 603

    The Doctor11

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Location:
    New York
    #4
  5. scott99 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2007
    #5
    They actually look a lot nicer than I thought they would.
     
  6. cleirac macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 7, 2014
    #6
    I am torn between a Milanese and that blue loop band thing. I might buy bought if I can use both in the same AWatch am pre-ordering unseen, if and when - it is a go with pre-orders.
     
  7. Donstil-nl macrumors 6502

    Donstil-nl

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #7
    I am not really sure if I want a Steel version with Steel band.
    Or a complete black one and that means SpaceGray Sport with Rubber or leather band.

    So I like this photos.

    Steel with steel:
    [​IMG]

    SpaceGray with rubber band:
    [​IMG]
     
  8. sjtidy macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    #8
    That last one in space grey looks pretty tempting. Looks much darker than the renders.
     
  9. Lucamegh macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    #9
    It's the most beautiful to me but I'm afraid for that glass screen… I don't want scratches on my :apple: Watch :(
     
  10. cmChimera macrumors 68040

    cmChimera

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    #10
    The space black is darker IRL too. Not sure where I saw the pic.
     
  11. Lucamegh macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    #11
    Here and by searching "apple watch hands on" on Google Images and selecting Search Tools -> Type -> Photo, you can find all the non-corporate photos you want :cool:
     
  12. Piggie macrumors 604

    Piggie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #12
    It's going to be really REALLY interesting to move forward a few years, as see if these models, and executives in nice suits are still all happily brandishing Apple Watches.

    Humans are funny animals.
    The sole reason they are wearing them now, will no longer be in place.
    It's going to be interesting to see if this changes.
     
  13. Chupa Chupa macrumors G5

    Chupa Chupa

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    #13
    To me at least I find the (supposedly) amateur field shots make the watch a lot more desirable than the pro studio ones. Funny how that works sometimes. I know it's true of BMWs too.
     
  14. Piggie macrumors 604

    Piggie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #14
    Well, that may actually be because you subconsciously feel they are more honest.
    We all know how a maker such as Apple set's up photo's. Studio lighting, Photoshop tweaks.
    Heck even the scene will be picked for the object.

    Remember those hollow cut away spheres they watches were or perhaps still are mounted in.

    They were cleverly made to disguise how thick the watch looks

    Take a sphere, cut a section of it away, then mount the watch within the sphere, so that if you try and look sideways on to see how thick the watch looks, you cannot see, as it's set back at just the right amount so the edge of the sphere cut away blocks your view as you try and look sideways.

    Clever, verging on slightly dishonest as it's deliberately made to block your viewpoint.

    But most won't even realise that.

    Or like a McBurger 1/4 pounder in a studio shot for the advert, as opposed to what you get in store when you actually order one, and compare it to the photo! :)

    Casual Real Life Photo's are more honest.
     
  15. Rogifan macrumors P6

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    #15
    Hmm... I think most of Apple's professional shots make the watch look thicker and bulkier than it is IRL.

    Btw, that third photo is actually an Apple employee.
     
  16. JayLenochiniMac macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Location:
    New Sanfrakota
    #16
    That's because the way the bands are attached hides the bulk when on the wrist and none of the renders show it modeled on a wrist.
     
  17. DC Wallaby, Feb 7, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2015

    DC Wallaby macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    #17
    That's why the Moto 360 looks so terrible to me: the bands are at the bottom, highlighting that it is a huge, thick watch. If the bands attached in the middle, it would look a lot more sleek and stylish.

    Which is another example of how Apple gets design and Motorola doesn't.

    EDIT: Thanks for pointing out my slip-up, Piggie.
     
  18. Piggie macrumors 604

    Piggie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    #18
    Wow this had cheered my day up :p

    Hate to point this out to you, but Samsung does not make the Moto 360

    Note: The clue is in the name!

    :D
     
  19. DC Wallaby macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    #19
    Ugh, I can't believe I did that! :eek: My bad. You're absolutely right, Piggie, Samsung has nothing to do with the Moto 360.

    The Moto 360 is better-looking than anything in the Galaxy Gear lineup though.
     

Share This Page