You sure don't act like it.
I'm simply stating that people are incessantly bitching about the Retina MBP missing an Ethernet Port, Optical Drive, Battery Indicator ... When all these things are made available on the Legacy MBP.
Which is to say, they are not made available on the Retina.
You're given options, it might be a difficult decision for some, but a choice is better than no choice.
It is a decision that means that instead of buying a $3k laptop, I'm sitting around complaining on forums, because
no computer Apple sells at any price can do what I want my computer to do.
Here's the thing. You keep acting as though the
only possiblities were:
1. Apple makes you choose between basic functionality and a new display.
2. Apple does not offer that functionality at all.
3. Apple does not offer the new display.
What people are expressing, and you seem unable to comprehend it, is that they would be happier if apple offered a machine which had the new display
and those other features.
Here's the thing: Options of the form "you can get A, or B. B is better but more expensive" are cool, because people can choose how much they want to spend, and they can get the one that's better. Options of the form "you can get A, or B. A is better in a way that is useful for your work, B is better in a way that is also useful for your work, but you cannot have both", by contrast,
suck. They leave you with no way to get the things you want.
The complaint here isn't that there's a choice; it's that it's a choice between two options which are both fundamentally flawed, when there is
no reason at all that Apple couldn't have provided a machine which had none of those flaws.
There is no technical barrier to making a machine that I would buy immediately even if it cost $3k. Apple has all the technology easily to hand. It wouldn't even cost noticably more than what they're shipping now. A machine just like the Retina, only with FW and Ethernet ports and a matte display, probably wouldn't cost more than $5 more to build than the one they're shipping -- but it would be worth $200 more to me, and apparently to many other prospective customers.
Look, just a crazy thought: What if you stopped assuming that everyone on forums is a complete idiot who cannot even comprehend the concept of choice, but rather, that they had
considered the choices, and concluded that:
1. There is no reason to structure the choice this way.
2. None of the options on offer meet our needs.