Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Darajavahus

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 8, 2015
194
314

Attachments

  • IMG_1723.png
    IMG_1723.png
    609.2 KB · Views: 188
  • IMG_1722.png
    IMG_1722.png
    677.4 KB · Views: 97

What I found most interesting is that display calibration is worse and idle energy consumption which is double of M2 which will suck for M3 MacBook Air.

That idle maximum figure is not a direct comparison. The 13" Pro used an older, less bright 60hz screen. The Air will be unaffected.
 
Seems the chip is faster and more efficient. I know there are lots of people crying but I really value the single core performance so I can’t wait to try out the M3 pro I got coming tomorrow. I know in the great multi core war of 2023 m3 pro is seemingly a loser but to me it’s gonna be a winner.
 
Seems the chip is faster and more efficient. I know there are lots of people crying but I really value the single core performance so I can’t wait to try out the M3 pro I got coming tomorrow. I know in the great multi core war of 2023 m3 pro is seemingly a loser but to me it’s gonna be a winner.
For someone like me who is going from a non-Apple laptop (with 8 GB RAM) to a MacBook Pro M3 36 GB RAM, I have nothing else to base the opinions on. It will just be a dramatic leap in computing performance.
 
That idle maximum figure is not a direct comparison. The 13" Pro used an older, less bright 60hz screen. The Air will be unaffected.
Could be tho they probably set them to the same brightness and 14” goes down to 24hz
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.