Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Noticeable performance difference between base M1 iMac and Mid?
- Thread starter Zaft
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
usagora
macrumors 601
Don't forget the 2 extra USB ports.
But I don't think the extra GPU core is going to make any huge difference for you. If it were me, the extra USB ports would be worth the $200 to me - extra GPU core would just be a little extra icing on the cake.
But I don't think the extra GPU core is going to make any huge difference for you. If it were me, the extra USB ports would be worth the $200 to me - extra GPU core would just be a little extra icing on the cake.
Last edited:
I would keep the 200 bucks in your pocket any day of the week, unless you structurally need the extra ports or if you have an unstable Wifi setup.
Reasons why:
- Price difference
- Not notable performance difference for your usecase
- Less fan noise: strangely the 2 fan version is louder than the 1 fan version (probably not a big issue whith light use)
- If you incidently need extra ports, you can always use a usb c hub with all the ports you need for 20 bucks. Which you will probably need anyway as most people still have some devices of cables with usb a plugs
You can get ethernet on the base version for an extra 30 bucks - the only difference is the power brick.
Don’t need many ports and I’m on wifi. I want to keep this iMac for at least as long as my 2013. Just thinking maybe the extra core will be more future proof?
I don't subscribe to the concept of "future proofing," but spending $200 on 16GB RAM (instead of 8GB) will be much more likely to improve its usefulness in the future than an extra core. Even just browsing seems to take more and more memory every year.
There are several threads from people that have regretted getting only 8GB, although admittedly with more intensive needs than you.
Last edited:
True that browsing uses more RAM, but nowadays a different approach towards RAM is plausible. In the old days, too little RAM would make a system instantly extremely sluggish, because of the dependance on classical rotating hard disk drives.
With high speed storage, the speed gap between regular storage and RAM storage becomes much smaller and therefor less relevant. This is also one of the reasons why Macs can easily be fitted with "only" 8GB. Add the efficient use of hardware by the OS (since hardware and software are jointly developed by Apple), and there's a lot to say that 8GB will work more than sufficient for home use and light office use.
I use a Macbook Air M1 myself with 8GB and it works like a charm with al lot of programs "opened". And an iMac should be faster than my Macbook, as my Macbook's CPU throttles down the CPU more often to keep the temperature low, because, in contrast to the iMac, my Macbook has passive cooling.
With high speed storage, the speed gap between regular storage and RAM storage becomes much smaller and therefor less relevant. This is also one of the reasons why Macs can easily be fitted with "only" 8GB. Add the efficient use of hardware by the OS (since hardware and software are jointly developed by Apple), and there's a lot to say that 8GB will work more than sufficient for home use and light office use.
I use a Macbook Air M1 myself with 8GB and it works like a charm with al lot of programs "opened". And an iMac should be faster than my Macbook, as my Macbook's CPU throttles down the CPU more often to keep the temperature low, because, in contrast to the iMac, my Macbook has passive cooling.
Fishrrman
macrumors Nehalem
OP:
"Don’t need many ports and I’m on wifi. I want to keep this iMac for at least as long as my 2013. Just thinking maybe the extra core will be more future proof?"
The whole concept of "future proof" is to "buy more than you need" with the expectation that over time, your needs may "grow".
THAT'S WHY you want to spend the extra $200 now for the 4-port version with ethernet built into the power adapter.
Someday you may actually need those things.
Oh, and "one more thing"...
You want 16gb of RAM.
DO NOT buy an m1 Mac with only 8gb.
The extra RAM is one of those things you may "need most of all" in the future.
"Don’t need many ports and I’m on wifi. I want to keep this iMac for at least as long as my 2013. Just thinking maybe the extra core will be more future proof?"
The whole concept of "future proof" is to "buy more than you need" with the expectation that over time, your needs may "grow".
THAT'S WHY you want to spend the extra $200 now for the 4-port version with ethernet built into the power adapter.
Someday you may actually need those things.
Oh, and "one more thing"...
You want 16gb of RAM.
DO NOT buy an m1 Mac with only 8gb.
The extra RAM is one of those things you may "need most of all" in the future.
StoneJack
macrumors 68040
one can be absolutely fine with 8GB of RAM. I have both 16GB Macbook Air m1 and 8GB Mac Mini M1, there is not much difference in performance at all.