Can this be used as a total replacement to At&t's SMS? Would it be under the rules for Google to develop an SMS app?
From what I understand, it's just a way to send a text message to a friend's phone from the gmail chat sidebar. Whoever you send a text to will still incur text charges if they don't have unlimited text.
Does AT&T charge customers for receiving text messages?
You have a very good point. I never thought twice about having a local area code for my mobile phone number. Japan is like Australia. They have mobile-specific area codes that look totally different than those of the land phones. And they don't have to pay to receive calls/texts.Paying to receive calls/SMS is ridiculous. One of the things I hated the most about the US/Canadian mobile phone system. That, and local area codes for mobile phones - they're MOBILE phones, not local phones. Same rate, wherever you are in the country, every mobile phone has the same area code so you know you're calling a mobile and that you'll pay more to do so.
Paying to receive calls/SMS is ridiculous. One of the things I hated the most about the US/Canadian mobile phone system. That, and local area codes for mobile phones - they're MOBILE phones, not local phones. Same rate, wherever you are in the country, every mobile phone has the same area code so you know you're calling a mobile and that you'll pay more to do so.
Paying for receiving is bad.
You have a very good point. I never thought twice about having a local area code for my mobile phone number. Japan is like Australia. They have mobile-specific area codes that look totally different than those of the land phones. And they don't have to pay to receive calls/texts.
Does gmail SMS work internationally or only within the us?
Paying to receive calls/SMS is ridiculous. One of the things I hated the most about the US/Canadian mobile phone system. That, and local area codes for mobile phones - they're MOBILE phones, not local phones. Same rate, wherever you are in the country, every mobile phone has the same area code so you know you're calling a mobile and that you'll pay more to do so.
Paying for receiving is bad.
I think right now it's only in the US.
In New York, we had a mobile-specific area code for a couple years, but federal law was passed that made that open to landlines and future mobile-only area codes won't be issued, at least as they were before. It was tied to a carrier or specific carriers and that was deemed to be wrongful.
The lack of mobile specific area codes allow us to take our phone numbers from a landline phone to a cell phone, and I appreciate that I could do that.
That, and local area codes for mobile phones - they're MOBILE phones, not local phones. Same rate, wherever you are in the country
Small White Car said:So why does it matter what the first 3 digits are?
Paying to receive calls/SMS is ridiculous. One of the things I hated the most about the US/Canadian mobile phone system. ...
Paying for receiving is bad.
You can add an SMS Lab to your Gmail web page, and then put in a phone # and message and send a SMS to a phone from Gmail.What is Gmail SMS?
Depends on who you talk to...That was dirtyPaying for receiving is bad.
I must be missing something.... because I don't really see the purpose of this.