bombardier10
macrumors regular
An ultra performance Nvidia Spark machine from Gigabyte thats amazing )
Nvidia does the same thing too claims for their chipset lol they even can't beat Snapdragon on the CPUAnd yet, Apple claimed that their M1 series beats Nvidia RTX 30 series which turns out to be false and since then, they only compare with their own chips
I never said the Hardware or software couldn't run the games, is just apple that doesn't lend support, the games you mentioned prove that apple doesn't really care about gamers, they are great game on their own merits, they are just older games, will GTA 6, the Witcher 4 run upon release, the capability is probably there, but I'm afraid by the time they are ported to MAC os they probably will be old news, unfortunately. there is more support for Linux on gaming than Mac OS.Cyberpunk 2077, Baldur's Gate 3, Resident Evil Village, all running natively on Apple Silicon, +1,700 titles. The reason the catalog is smaller isn't that the Mac can't, it's that studios chase the bigger install base. Fewer ports ≠ incapable.
“Crush” is unlikely, “beat” would be good enough for me.Nice! M6 will crush them all. Can’t wait for November event! Really hope for one more thing, like 5 years ago when Apple introduced Apple silicon moments.
An ultra performance Nvidia Spark machine from Gigabyte thats amazing )
CPU is easy to develop, not GPU. Good luck with that.Nvidia does the same thing too claims for their chipset lol they even can't beat Snapdragon on the CPU
I want Apple crush them using 2nm GAAFET but still really hope using BS-PDN(Backside Power Delivery Network) maybe coming the next 2 years“Crush” is unlikely, “beat” would be good enough for me.
Maybe not everyone can develop GPU but at least Apple trying, even AMD and Intel trying to catch up but still loses because cuda still superiorCPU is easy to develop, not GPU. Good luck with that.
If this was the case apple couldn't make mac computers fast enough, Macs are toys with some niche applications, that's about it, they used to be big on the education market, but chrome books ate that market, if you want to do local AI then maybe, that's about it, The best computer is the one that can accomplish the task at hand, being windows MAC os, Linux, there is no such thing as a perfect device, a perfect OS for everyone, since no combination of os and hardware have 100% of the market, you like Macs and its os, keep using them everyone else that like something else will use that.The M5 Max has 614 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the RTX Spark has 300 GB/s. So yeah, the M5 Max will be faster.
If this was the case apple couldn't make mac computers fast enough,
This is a recent development, with memory scarcity and higher prices, until the end of last year you could get any mac mini quite easily, even from Amazon.com.They can't.
Try buy a Mac mini for example. Anyone doing AI development is likely working on a Mac, and that's only the most significant paradigm shift in the past 30 years.
This is a recent development, with memory scarcity and higher prices, until the end of last year you could get any mac mini quite easily, even from Amazon.com.
Between 10 and maybe 15 of market share, definitely toys.Sure, but it totally invalidates your claim that Macs are just toys.
That's just silly. The desktop market userbase does not consist of professionals. It's mostly a consumer market.Between 10 and maybe 15 of market share, definitely toys.
Right. I'll go tell the building designers I work for that they're designing houses with toys, and that I'm doing thermal simulations and drafting on a toy.Between 10 and maybe 15 of market share, definitely toys.
The memory hierarchies are different, and, as I understand it, gives each platform an advantage on different types of AI applications, which isn't my interest. But, they will also perform differently on different types of graphics applications, not all of which are "gaming" (believe it or not 😉), and, likewise, numerical simulations.M5 Max has 614 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the RTX Spark has 300 GB/s.
Thanks for pointing that out. Real specs here: TOP_ATOMAn ultra performance Nvidia Spark machine from Gigabyte thats amazing )
Yes, what we have seen so far doesn't look "mobile". I'm not sure what that "Microsoft Surface" type thing is going to be like. Sounds like a thermal problem waiting to happen.My FE Spark--while a right-beastie--is thirsty, and sheds an enormous amount of heat . . . nVidia is going to have to gimp Teh Gimp to shoehorn this into a battery-life-conscious platform.
Alex Ziskind has a preview of the RTX Spark that mentions that nVidia's ConnectX-7 NIC costs around $1500.Added to that is some very good connectivity, including 10 GbE, and, "1 x NVIDIA ConnectX-7", a QSFP-based interconnect for up to 400Gbps connections. (I haven't looked deeply into this, but, my understanding is that this can be configured to be a small 400 Gbps LAN. If so, this addresses the issues people have with trying to use Thunderbolt via USB-C this way.)
That's thinking from five years ago. Much has changed since then.CPU is easy to develop, not GPU. Good luck with that.
Where did you get that number for Sparx because I can't find any official release from Nvidia?The M5 Max has 614 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the RTX Spark has 300 GB/s. So yeah, the M5 Max will be faster.
It's a GB10 -- the chip has been out for a year now and its specs are well known https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/gb10.c4342Where did you get that number for Sparx because I can't find any official release from Nvidia?
Alex Ziskind has a preview of the RTX Spark that mentions that nVidia's ConnectX-7 NIC costs around $1500.
a QSFP-based interconnect for up to 400Gbps connections. (I haven't looked deeply into this, but, my understanding is that this can be configured to be a small 400 Gbps LAN. If so, this addresses the issues people have with trying to use Thunderbolt via USB-C this way.)
Then which 500 company uses macs exclusively, not mom and pop shop but any big enterprise company?That's just silly. The desktop market userbase does not consist of professionals. It's mostly a consumer market.
Just by virtue of being priced above the median, macs are very much for professionals. Now what professionals is another matter, but still professionals.