NY Times pogue review up

Discussion in 'iPad' started by Buck987, Mar 31, 2010.

  1. kyleaa macrumors regular

    Jun 20, 2006
    Not that either of them reveal much, but Pogue's review could have been written a month ago... The only real item that he got out of a hands-on was his battery life test. I have never had a preference for Pogue or Mossberg, but I think Mossberg's review is much more informative.
  2. marksman macrumors 603


    Jun 4, 2007
    I think he got too cute with the idea for having two reviews in one and was so taken by the concept that he essentially blew off the actual purpose of the article (reviewing the iPad) and just executed his silly idea.
  3. samcraig macrumors P6

    Jun 22, 2009
    Hmmmm so far both seem to think/imply that for content CREATION, the iPad isn't "better" (for example then a laptop). For consumption - it's a great experience. Interesting.
  4. SirCrumpet macrumors regular


    Jun 9, 2007
    Brisbane, Australia
    I love the sound of that, though the implementation could make or break it...
  5. skubish macrumors 68030


    Feb 2, 2005
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
  6. dwd3885 macrumors 68020

    Dec 10, 2004
    both reviews are blah. written for the vast majority of people. Wait until Gizmodo and Engadget get then and then you will get the review from a true tech perspective.
  7. Buck987 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Jan 16, 2010

Share This Page