NY Times pogue review up

Discussion in 'iPad' started by Buck987, Mar 31, 2010.

  1. kyleaa macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    #3
    Not that either of them reveal much, but Pogue's review could have been written a month ago... The only real item that he got out of a hands-on was his battery life test. I have never had a preference for Pogue or Mossberg, but I think Mossberg's review is much more informative.
     
  2. marksman macrumors 603

    marksman

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    #4
    I think he got too cute with the idea for having two reviews in one and was so taken by the concept that he essentially blew off the actual purpose of the article (reviewing the iPad) and just executed his silly idea.
     
  3. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #5
    Hmmmm so far both seem to think/imply that for content CREATION, the iPad isn't "better" (for example then a laptop). For consumption - it's a great experience. Interesting.
     
  4. SirCrumpet macrumors regular

    SirCrumpet

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    #6
    I love the sound of that, though the implementation could make or break it...
     
  5. skubish macrumors 68030

    skubish

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
  6. dwd3885 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #8
    both reviews are blah. written for the vast majority of people. Wait until Gizmodo and Engadget get then and then you will get the review from a true tech perspective.
     
  7. Buck987 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    #9
    +1
     

Share This Page