Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sounds like a ridiculous excuse. The extra horsepower is certainly welcome, but does not prevent development of AI.

Yeah I'm far from an AI expert but a lack of GPUs is pretty clearly not the problem. This is a standard software development issue, not a resource issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
At the time, Apple's data centers had about 50,000 GPUs that were more than five years old – far fewer than the hundreds of thousands of chips being purchased by competitors like Microsoft, Google, and Meta.
At this point and given how much processing power AI requires I begin to question “is it really worth it?”. Yeah Nvidia and AMD get increased value on the market, what else, an Internet flooded with cringeworthy AI-generated images? I dunno. Good photographer is still better than an army of AI tools.

Citing the classics, “It is unsustainable!”. What sustainability can we talk about if kilowatts of power are being wasted for people making brainrot “memes” like a shark wearing Nike Air sneakers or dinosaurs on skateboards sippin’ their iced frappe. Sanity quit the chat.

In my opinion, Apple should pursuit something much more sustainable than this. AI is cool but I doubt it is a killer feature, people still buy smartphones to chat, surf the web and make calls, not to ask AI to tell some jokes or help them with their insecurities
 
He'd be out on his rear end for such a stunt. This is mere speculation.
He's already been reassigned and fixers have been brought in to take over duties that used to fall to him. That's basically Tim Cook giving his project leadership a vote of no confidence, so it wouldn't surprise me people close to him are trying to pin some blame on Maestri, who is no longer with the company. It's all still a cluster----, but these press reports are 100% different teams at Apple covering their behinds and throwing others under the bus over this.
 
  • Love
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
So now we have John Giannandrea or people close to him leaking to the press that the Apple Intelligence issues aren’t his fault. Reports from Bloomberg, The Information and now The NY Times on this are basically spinning narratives from the different camps at Apple to pin the blame. And at the end of the day, it sounds like most of these features will be out by September anyway. Embarrassing for sure but not nearly as big a story as the macro-economic forces that are far more a threat to Apple in the next three years.
Just a minor point that, for Apple in particular, microeconomic events may be more a near term threat than macroeconomics.
 
It’s always the bean counters. I’m not saying Apple should be wasteful, but this is a trillion dollar company with multiple tens of billions in profit every quarter.

This is really not a good sign. With you let the finance people control the company it’s doomed to fail.

100% this
It's just a matter of the speed and degree of decline, but not the inevitability of it.
 
All comes back to failed leadership at Apple. Changes are need immediately, starting with Tim Cook.
I completely agree. If Tim Cook isn’t strong enough to control his CFO, the time for change at the top is overdue. Gratitude for his outstanding work in the years following Steve's death should not stand in the way of a necessary change. All good things must come to an end.
 
I completely agree. If Tim Cook isn’t strong enough to control his CFO, the time for change at the top is overdue. Gratitude for his outstanding work in the years following Steve's death should not stand in the way of a necessary change. All good things must come to an end.

100% this 👆

Maybe this part of the CEO job is too much for Tim.
 
I can't believe they needed internal testing to know that Siri was that bad. I still have a 1st gen Echo Dot that does more with less screw ups, and I almost exclusively whisper to it.

I understand what you meant but now I can't help picturing someone leaning over to their Echo Dot, whispering lovingly to it "You're better than Siri."
 
This is the main reason why Apple cant develop their own AI thanks to poor Apple Silicon chip's expandability and chip design. We all know that and they have to use GPU from other companies instead. Since they are struggling with making Ultra chips and even Extreme chips, it was only a matter of time.

At this point, they really need to change the chip design as M6 series are expected to have a whole new chip design that I mentioned multiple times before and start making higher-end chips as Apple is refusing to use Nvidia GPU for a while.
 
  • Like
Reactions: platinumaqua
Apple should aqui-hire DeepSeek and focus on efficiency and working smarter instead of focusing on size. And use all their cabbage to pay all creators for their content used in LLMs since creators are a core customer. Otherwise it's like "heyyy creators, use our LLMs as we partake of and fund companies hell bent on devaluing your life." Thinking different means not copying ClosedAI and the rest of the TESCREAL set.
 
LLMs are such a basic feature that apple probably needs to make one but LLMs and image generation both conflict with a central apple tenet - the privacy security achieved by doing everything on phone or computer. LLMs are too big for most phones and good image generation is too big for most phones in terms of size and computational power. So they made some reasonable tradeoff that result in some garbage.
I mostly agree, and the situation is made worse by Apple's long noted RAM stinginess. After all, they basically admitted you need 16 GB RAM for a real OS to use AI and do anything else at the same time.

The privacy point is a real problem and might offer Apple a way out. The user has three options;
1) No AI at all.
2) Very limited AI on machines with sufficient resources that fully respects privacy and security. Personal data never leaves the Mac.
3) Full AI with the full admission that all your data will sent to a central server and therefore privacy and security can not be guaranteed. Such a treasure trove of data will be under continuous attack by nearly every government and criminal organization on the planet.

Future improvements should make option 2 more useful over time, and you should be able to set up a Secure (AI free) user account for your financial data and also have a Full AI user account that only has data you don't mind sharing with the planet (cat videos?) or your programming code you were going to post on GitHub anyway. Keeping the AI from your data is an Apple task to keep AI sandboxed from the OS and other user accounts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.