Obama Administration Vetoes Partial Ban on Apple Products

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacRumors, Aug 3, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MacRumors macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    The Obama administration has vetoed a partial ban on the import and sale of some Apple products which was granted back in June in response to a ruling made by the USITC (United States International Trade Commission). The ban, which applied to AT&T models of the iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS, and the 3G models of the iPad and the iPad 2, was granted after the USITC found that the aforementioned products infringed on a Samsung patent, specifically Patent No. 7,706,348, titled "Apparatus and method for encoding/decoding transport format combination indicator in CDMA mobile communication system."

    Today, in a letter to Irving A. Williamson, the Chairman of the USITC, the United States Trade Representative Michael B. G. Froman declared the following:
    The letter further went on to note that the Obama administration was "committed to promoting innovation and economic progress, including through providing adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights".

    The Verge has noted that this is the first time since 1987 that the President of the United States has interfered with a decision from the ITC. This comes after the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) recently criticised this sort of use of sales bans (rather than monetary compensation) as a means of executing patent infringement - as it in effect harms rival products and companies and does not promote a competitive trading environment. CNet had previously cited experts who believed it was unlikely for the administration to step in on this case.

    Just last week, Verizon attorney Randal Milch published an open letter calling for presidential intervention in this case to veto the ban. The ban would have otherwise gone into effect on August 5th, 2013.

    Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the comment thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All MacRumors forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

    Article Link: Obama Administration Vetoes Partial Ban on Apple Products
  2. Cubeeless, Aug 3, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 4, 2013

    Cubeeless macrumors regular


    Apr 6, 2012
  3. Consultant macrumors G5


    Jun 27, 2007
    Finally, the President clarifies that FRAND patents can't be used recklessly in the United States.
  4. bushido Suspended


    Mar 26, 2008
    well this should make it clear that the current patent system in the US is pathetic right? time to change it, apparently its important enough for obama if he bothers to veto the ban .. :rolleyes:

  5. Sardonick007 macrumors regular


    May 18, 2011
    Prez needs to stay out of these types of things. There's already enough bureaucracy in place. He needs to run the country, not business.
  6. oliversl macrumors 65816

    Jun 29, 2007
    Excellent news!
    Apple said it will pay the same amount of licensing that Samsung is charging everybody else. So, there is no justification for Samsung to ask for more money.

    FRAND licenses should be used as FRAND!
  7. notabadname macrumors 65816


    Jan 4, 2010
    Detroit Suburbs
    Politics and pro or con Apple oportunities abound. Why do I think this thread may break the 500 post mark rather quickly? :rolleyes:
  8. orangebluedevil macrumors 6502

    Jun 28, 2010
  9. Earendil macrumors 68000


    Oct 27, 2003
    While I understand what you mean, the economics of the United States IS business. Unless of course you want the United States to get involved in another war, or start making love.

    That said, this is exactly the sort of thing the President should be getting involved with. Sometimes you need a large group of people to temper a single ruler, and sometimes you need one man to cut through the bureaucratic crap and do what's right. That's both the Pro and the Con to our form of government.

    Besides, that's what the government does, invoke policy to protect/promote/keep safe the individual, companies, and allies of the united states, at least when their having a good day. This happens to fall into protecting both the individual consumer that hopes to purchase one of the United States top products, and protecting a US company from overzealous punishment. Allowing this to go forward would punish groups that weren't directly involved. They should fine Apple and call it a day.
  10. tito2020 macrumors 6502a

    Oct 16, 2011
    he just wants to see blackberry die already lol.
  11. Reason077 macrumors 68020


    Aug 14, 2007
    Mister Obama, please use your presidential powers to veto iOS 7 while there's still time!
  12. duffman9000 macrumors 68000


    Sep 7, 2003
    Deep in the Depths of CA
    Where ya at MegaManX with Obama won't veto this...lol.
  13. taptic macrumors 65816


    Dec 5, 2012
  14. Sky Blue Guest

    Sky Blue

    Jan 8, 2005
    Obama Administration Vetoes iOS 7 icons on Apple Products
  15. bb426 macrumors 6502


    Jun 7, 2011
    Who cares what Obama's done and what he hasn't done.

    It's the first time since '87 that a president has done something about the crappy system we have that stifles innovation.
  16. mozumder macrumors 6502a

    Mar 9, 2009
    It is incorrect to believe less government is better.

    We need more bureaucracy and regulation, not less.

    It is government that generates all wealth.

    Without big government, we would have Somalia.

    Right now we need far more government bureaucrats in the Patent office so that they can do a better job of researching patent applications.

    The ITC ruling is a good example of the failure in the "less government" ideology.
  17. Eduardo1971 macrumors 65816


    Jun 16, 2006
    Lost Angeles, Ca. usa
    Very good decision by the president!

    This is a good example of government intervention that is necessary within the business community. Imagine the ramifications if the original ruling were to stand.
  18. j4zb4 macrumors 6502a


    Oct 15, 2011
    I feel it shouldn't have come so far in the first place...
  19. CEmajr macrumors 601

    Dec 18, 2012
    Charlotte, NC
    Good move by the US president. I applaud this decision.
  20. slapppy macrumors 65816

    Mar 20, 2008
    Samsung is Scum

    The administration finally did the right thing. Also, Samsung underhanded moves and slavish copying of Apple needs to stop!
  21. Koodauw macrumors 68040


    Nov 17, 2003
  22. sfwalter macrumors 68000


    Jan 6, 2004
    Dallas Texas
    What slam?
  23. Swift macrumors 68000


    Feb 18, 2003
    Los Angeles
    The president didn't do a thing. The administration did it. According to the law.
  24. thekev, Aug 3, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2013

    thekev macrumors 604


    Aug 5, 2010
    He didn't technically clarify that. Read through it and include the footnotes.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page