Oh I forgot u signed a contract. For a phone not cool. For a home yes, a car mabey. A phone that's just insanity.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Off the chart LTE speeds..what are you getting?
- Thread starter jsmith1
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Lame comeback. You still have to adhere to their terms and conditions. Just because you didn't sign a contract doesn't mean you don't have rules to abide by.
The contract excuse is pretty overused rebuttal. There's plenty of people out that have no issue reupping their contract because they aren't too cheap to pay for quality service.
I wouldn't call it misuse, but it does seem to be abnormal
Would you have any information regarding what carriers deem to be normal/abnormal use? I know a few years ago, in the country I lived in at the time, carriers had to be extremely specific as to what they considered to be normal usage if they had that as a limitation.If this means nothing to you, then... I don't know what to say. Maybe an english class is in order?
Do you have a subscription for unlimited data without having signed a contract?
Either way, how are you reaching those numbers on a phone?
I wouldn't call it misuse, but it does seem to be abnormal
Honestly, it's a pretty grey area. The carriers reserve the right to do anything they want due to the convoluted phrasing they use. AT&T had said you would get throttled at 5gb on an unlimited plan, but that seems to be relaxed recently. VZW really doesn't say anything specific either.
yes thru T-Mobile all off of their plans include unlimited data. But u can choose how much high speed data you want(500mb, 2gb or unlimited)Do you have a subscription for unlimited data without having signed a contract?
Either way, how are you reaching those numbers on a phone?
Watching live TV, FaceTime video conferencing, Netflix Hulu ect.
It's not that hard to burn through 50GB in a month streaming. I have the MLB package. Just watching one game a day, my usage on my home internet usage averages close to 180 GB a month. I don't stream any other video or use my computer that much other than checking email and FB. It's only the 4th of June and I have used closed to 15 GB.
No, AT&T/VZW phased out unlimited plans because they realized that they could obtain more cash from heavy data users (legit or otherwise). They do this by inventing a narrative that somehow, it is the responsibility of end users to protect a "limited natural resource" that is restricted only by the fact that the carriers choose to defer infrastructure upgrades and delay the incorporation of already-licensed spectrum on their networks.
And clearly, you drank the Koolaid.
"Abuse," according to most carrier-level TOSes that don't have ulterior price motives, usually entails using a network connection for illegal activity, or specifically using your bandwidth for the sole purpose of deliberately denying other users' access to the same.
If he was launching DDoS attacks, or spamming, or attempting to gain unauthorized access to other systems then he's abusing the network.
If he was streaming audio/video 24/7 and not even bothering to watch it, then he's abusing the network.
But if he was using netflix to legitimately watch movies, or listen to Pandora, then that's perfectly acceptable use of his internet connection.
Note that the top two wireless carriers are making the case that their wireless networks are good enough to replace wireline voice/data connections that they are refusing to repair after natural disasters. These same data usages are considered perfectly acceptable and non-abusive on a wired DSL, FiOS or U-Verse connection. So, it should not be considered abuse on wireless networks, either.
The only difference here is that if a user uses 50GB of data on anything other than a capped cellular data plan, they won't incur something in the neighborhood of $460 in overages. By rights, if this were truly abuse and truly a strain on the network, AT&T/Verizon should terminate your service to protect its core network. But they don't. They just happily charge you overage fees.
By the way, on an average AT&T LTE connection, that 50GB download will take 9 minutes. How is getting charged $51.11 per minute of data usage not "abuse?"
Last edited:
Your last paragraph completely obliterated any point you were trying to make. Anyone arguing that the average AT&T LTE connection would be about 800 Mbps simply can't be taken seriously. Sorry.
I got about 60 on my S3 on the CT shoreline. WTF are you doing with 50GB/mo?!?!?! I've used way more than that on cable, but sheesh. Back when I had unlimited data, I think I averaged 50 MB/mo. That is just plain and simple abuse. I don't know how T-Mobile and Sprint think they are going to keep up with abusive users unless they implement some very god network management (and then have a bunch of pissed off abusers who think they are entitled to use way more than their fair share).