Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not only that but they removed iPhone music browsing man from the watch. Anyway lol I’ll stop whining about this. I say vote with my dollars but holy cow garmin watches are expensive!
Your complaint is valid. If I wasn’t an Apple Music user I’d be furious. I’m an Apple Music user and I frown on this. And yeah, I looked at one this year - one of the solar ones cuz I wanted 14+ day battery life and … wow… they aren’t cheap lol. If you get one, please do a review. :D
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1rottenapple
I recall modifying my high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts on Apple Fitness+ during my business trip around New Year’s in January. My company had booked a block of rooms in an old Best Western hotel, which unfortunately lacked a fitness center. Since I was staying on the third floor, the dense floors and walls sometimes made it easy for people to hear me doing jumps if I didn’t modify my workouts. As a result, I had to resort to doing all bodyweight exercises and yoga/stretches in my room. I also had to pack a yoga towel in the carry on bag , which I washed after every workout.
Well, either that or they thought you were one lucky person!
 
A couple of watchOS versions ago, they used to allow unlimited storage on music synced from an iPhone. Nowadays, the storage limit is capped at 2GB, not enough for me to even sync 20 songs! I don't know why, but that renders 64GB storage of my Apple Watch Ultra 2 completely pointless. I would otherwise fit my entire watch with music, EASILY.
I'm confused. Supposedly music storage is limited to 25% of the total capacity of the watch...so 8 GB for watches that have 32 GB of storage, and 16 GB for watches that have 64 of GB storage.

Also, if yours is capped at 2 GB and can only sync 20 songs, your songs are around 100 MB each?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.