Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Old Macbook Pro vs Macbook unibody?

luisomtz

luisomtz

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Im getting rid of my hp laptop, it just sucks! But well. Someone is selling a Macbook Pro (last gen) new for 1500 dls. At this price, is almost the same as the new Unibody macbook (non pro). How do they compare to each other? I use this laptop mostly at home as i have a netbook for use at college. So which one is a better deal? Thanks guys
 
luisomtz said:
Im getting rid of my hp laptop, it just sucks! But well. Someone is selling a Macbook Pro (last gen) new for 1500 dls. At this price, is almost the same as the new Unibody macbook (non pro). How do they compare to each other? I use this laptop mostly at home as i have a netbook for use at college. So which one is a better deal? Thanks guys
Click to expand...

The last gen Macbook Pros are pretty decent machines, and especially their graphics card- which is better than the current ones in the Macbooks.

Providing specs of the Macbook Pro in question might help in understanding which is a better machine.
 
It is the 2.4 C2D with 2GB of ram and 160gb of HDD. Is the new 9400m faster than the 8600m? Thanks
 
Nope.

9600GT is a die shrinkage of the 8600GT with a few improvements

9400m is about 70% as fast as 8600gt. Good enough IMO. But as far as performance gots

9600GT > 8600GT >>> 9400m
 
If you'd like to search the threads, you can see that this question has been asked and answered about thirty times already.

I'm not trying to be a d#@k, but you'd get a lot of info and opinion right now instead of waiting for a day or two for it to trickle in.
 
You won't be upset with 2.4 C2D from the previous gen. Mine is still a very capable machine that has been doing me justice since summer '07. And imo I like the previous body design and matte screen over the new glassy unibodies. Just my choice.
 
wankey said:
Nope.

9600GT is a die shrinkage of the 8600GT with a few improvements

9400m is about 70% as fast as 8600gt. Good enough IMO. But as far as performance gots

9600GT > 8600GT >>> 9400m
Click to expand...

The 9400M isn't that fast. 55% would be more accurate.
 
I just got the previous gen macbook pro 15 from the UCLA store here in Los Angeles for $1199. I am not even a student. I think this was a really good price and I love it. 2.5 250gig 2gig ram
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back